Use of coronary revascularization in patients with unstable and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
1Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. jpopma@partners.org
Insights
An aggressive strategy of early coronary arteriography and revascularization is recommended for most patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina, especially those at intermediate or high risk. Lipid-lowering therapy is crucial for all acute coronary syndrome patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina.
- Debate exists regarding routine early coronary arteriography and revascularization for non-ST-segment elevation MI and unstable angina.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of invasive versus conservative strategies in managing patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina.
- To identify patient subgroups who benefit most from an aggressive interventional approach.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of four major clinical trials comparing invasive and conservative strategies for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina.
- Review of outcomes including death, MI, and rehospitalization rates.
- Consideration of advancements in treatment, such as coronary stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Main Results:
- Early trials (TIMI IIIB, VANQWISH) showed no reduction in death or MI with invasive strategies but decreased rehospitalization.
- Later trials (FRISC II, TACTICS) demonstrated significant reductions in death or MI with invasive strategies, particularly in intermediate- and high-risk patients.
- Intermediate- and high-risk patients, comprising approximately 75% of cases, showed the greatest benefit from invasive management.
Conclusions:
- An invasive approach is indicated for the majority of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina.
- Lipid-lowering therapy is essential for all acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients to prevent recurrent ischemic events.
- Risk stratification is key to optimizing treatment strategies in ACS management.
Abstract:
Percutaneous coronary intervention can be safely performed in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. Although there remains debate about whether an aggressive strategy involving early coronary arteriography and revascularization should be routinely performed in patients who present with non-ST-segment elevation MI and unstable angina, recent clinical trials suggest that an aggressive approach should be taken in both intermediate- and high-risk patients with ACS. There have been 4 clinical trials that have compared the outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina who were assigned to invasive or conservative strategies. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB trial and the Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) trial failed to demonstrate a reduction in death or MI in patients assigned to an invasive approach, but it did demonstrate an important reduction in the frequency of rehospitalization. However, these studies were performed before the availability of coronary stents or the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In contrast, the Fragmin and Fast Revascularisation During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) II and the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS) trials demonstrated significant improvements in the rates of death or MI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina assigned to an invasive strategy. Event reductions were greatest in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina at intermediate or high risk for an adverse outcome. Understanding that these subgroups comprise approximately 75% of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina, we believe that an invasive approach is indicated in most patients who develop non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina. Regardless of the strategy used in ACS patients, lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce recurrent ischemia events at the site of plaque instability and in atherosclerotic disease remote to the target lesion.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
