Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Techniques for liver MR imaging.

M M Morrin1, N M Rofsky

  • 1Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. mmorrin@caregroup.harvard.edu

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|November 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of cognitive magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted transperineal and MR-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy techniques in a matched patient cohort.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same author

Biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: rationalisation of the approach to imaging.

Clinical radiology·2023
Same author

ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis.

European radiology·2020
Same author

National Survey of CT Colonography Practice in Ireland.

Irish medical journal·2016
Same author

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: experience of a tertiary referral center.

Renal failure·2010
Same author

MR urography versus retrograde pyelography/ureteroscopy for the exclusion of upper urinary tract malignancy.

Clinical radiology·2010
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior soft tissue contrast for evaluating liver disorders. Fast scanning techniques, enabled by advanced hardware, now overcome motion artifacts for comprehensive liver assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Hepatology and Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a powerful tool for liver disorder evaluation due to its exceptional soft tissue contrast.
  • Traditional MR imaging of the abdomen faced limitations due to motion artifacts, impacting image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
  • Advances in MR technology have focused on improving speed and reducing artifacts for abdominal applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current Magnetic Resonance imaging strategies for liver evaluation.
  • To highlight the role and benefits of fast scanning techniques in liver MR imaging.
  • To discuss how recent technological advancements enhance the diagnostic capabilities for liver disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current Magnetic Resonance imaging techniques and strategies for liver assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on the application and advantages of rapid acquisition sequences.
  • Discussion of technological enablers including high-performance gradient systems and phased-array coils.

    • Main Results:

    • Fast scanning techniques enable artifact-free Magnetic Resonance images with high contrast-to-noise ratios.
    • Advanced MR hardware and software significantly reduce examination times.
    • These advancements overcome previous limitations posed by patient motion in abdominal MR imaging.

    Conclusions:

    • Magnetic Resonance imaging, particularly with fast scanning techniques, provides a comprehensive and efficient method for liver evaluation.
    • Modern MR technology allows for reliable assessment of a wide range of liver disorders.
    • The integration of rapid imaging strategies is crucial for optimizing diagnostic performance in liver Magnetic Resonance imaging.