Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preparation for professional self-regulation.

J M Braxton1, L L Baird

  • 1Vanderbilt University, Department of Leadership and Organizations, Peabody College, Box 514, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. john.m.braxton.1@vanderbilt.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|November 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protecting TPN and lipid infusions from light: reducing hydroperoxides in NICU patients.

Neonatal network : NN·2002
Same author

Reputational ratings of doctoral programs.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1978
Same author

The characteristics of medical students and their views of the first year.

Journal of medical education·1975
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Graduate programs must prepare scientists for research self-regulation. Doctoral study can integrate training in detecting, deterring, and sanctioning scientific misconduct, ensuring research integrity.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Ethics
  • Graduate Education

Background:

  • The scientific community relies on self-regulation for responsible research conduct.
  • Current graduate programs may not adequately prepare scientists for this role.
  • Ensuring ethical practices is crucial for maintaining public trust in science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assert the necessity of integrating self-regulation preparation into graduate studies.
  • To outline methods for incorporating self-regulation training within doctoral programs.
  • To discuss the relevance of US doctoral study stages to self-regulation preparedness.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current graduate study structures in the United States.
  • Analysis of potential pedagogical approaches for teaching professional self-regulation.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of key stages in doctoral training relevant to ethical conduct.

    • Main Results:

    • Doctoral programs can be modified to foster attitudes and values for professional self-regulation.
    • Specific training can prepare future scientists to deter, detect, and sanction research misconduct.
    • Faculty advisors, coursework, and departmental policies are key areas for intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Graduate education must evolve to include robust training in research self-regulation.
    • Proactive preparation enhances the responsible conduct of research.
    • Implementing these recommendations will strengthen scientific integrity and community standards.