Related Experiment Videos
Localized wear of compomer restorative materials
M A Latta1, W W Barkmeier, T M Wilwerding
1Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, Center for Oral Health Research, Omaha NE 68178, USA. mlatta@creighton.edu
American Journal of Dentistry
|November 9, 2001
Summary
This study compared the localized wear of six compomer restorative materials. F2000, Hytac, and Elan exhibited significantly less wear than Compoglass F, Dyract AP, and Dyract, indicating differences in compomer wear rates.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Compomers are widely used in restorative dentistry due to their handling properties and fluoride release.
- Understanding the wear resistance of different compomer formulations is crucial for predicting their clinical longevity.
- Localized wear can significantly impact the functional and aesthetic outcomes of dental restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess and compare the localized wear of six commercially available compomer restorative materials.
- To identify compomers with superior wear resistance for potential clinical applications.
Main Methods:
- Specimens of six compomers (Dyract, Dyract AP, F2000, Compoglass F, Elan, Hytac) were prepared and subjected to simulated localized wear using a Leinfelder wear machine.
- Surface profilometry was employed to measure volume loss and wear facet depth before and after wear simulation.
- Statistical analysis, including ANOVA and Tukey's test, was performed to determine significant differences in wear between materials.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in both volume loss and maximum wear depth were observed among the tested compomers.
- F2000, Hytac, and Elan demonstrated significantly lower volume loss and wear depth compared to Compoglass F, Dyract AP, and Dyract.
- No significant difference in volumetric loss was found between F2000 and Hytac, or between Hytac and Elan.
Conclusions:
- The in vitro wear rates of compomer materials vary significantly.
- Compomers F2000, Hytac, and Elan exhibit superior localized wear resistance compared to Compoglass F, Dyract AP, and Dyract.
- These findings have implications for material selection in clinical restorative dentistry to enhance restoration durability.