Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimizing electrode and filter selection in cochlear implant speech processor maps.

K R Henshall1, C M McKay

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|November 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rate-of-processing ability in children using cochlear implants and its relevance to speech perception.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

The many facets of intestinal peristalsis.

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2006
Same author

Characterization of depolarization-evoked ERG K currents in interstitial cells of Cajal.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2006
Same author

Short-term auditory memory in children using cochlear implants and its relevance to receptive language.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2002
Same author

Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants.

Ear and hearing·2001
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Removing non-tonotopic electrodes did not improve cochlear implant speech understanding. Extending high-frequency mapping also failed to enhance speech perception in users of the Nucleus CI22 implant.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants aim to restore hearing by stimulating the auditory nerve.
  • Optimizing speech processor maps is crucial for maximizing speech understanding in cochlear implant users.
  • Electrode mapping strategies influence frequency representation and sound perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if removing non-tonotopic electrodes improves speech understanding in cochlear implant users.
  • To determine if extending the high-frequency range of electrode maps enhances speech perception.
  • To evaluate the impact of electrode map modifications on auditory perception.

Main Methods:

  • Seven users of the Nucleus CI22 implant and Spectra processor participated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Non-tonotopic electrodes were identified using multidimensional scaling.
  • Two experimental maps were created with non-tonotopic electrodes removed.
  • Speech perception was tested after users experienced the experimental maps.

    • Main Results:

    • Removing non-tonotopic electrodes did not improve speech perception.
    • Extending the high-frequency map range did not enhance speech understanding.
    • Potential reasons include altered frequency-to-electrode allocation and processor limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Current methods for refining cochlear implant maps by removing non-tonotopic electrodes may not benefit speech understanding.
    • Extending high-frequency mapping is not beneficial with current processor technology.
    • Further research is needed to optimize cochlear implant speech processing strategies.