Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictive genetic testing in children.

J Savulescu1

  • 1Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC. savulesj@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|November 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commercial Impacts on Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Scoping Review.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2025
Same author

Ethical and practical questions in satisfying the human right to unconsciousness at the end of life: a reply.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

General anaesthesia does not inevitably result in apnoea or require ventilatory support.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

General anaesthesia in end-of-life care: extending the indications for anaesthesia beyond surgery.

Anaesthesia·2021
Same author

A right to be unconscious.

Anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Responsibility, prudence and health promotion.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2018

Predictive genetic testing for children is recommended only when medically beneficial or for early-onset diseases. Ethical considerations and potential harms like discrimination must be weighed against benefits such as self-knowledge.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Pediatric Genetics
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Predictive genetic testing in children requires careful consideration of their best interests.
  • Defining "best interests" encompasses psychosocial well-being and medical necessity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the ethical framework for performing predictive genetic testing in pediatric populations.
  • To delineate conditions under which predictive genetic testing is ethically permissible for children.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of existing guidelines and case studies.
  • Review of medical and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in minors.

Main Results:

  • Testing is appropriate for conditions with childhood onset or where early intervention is crucial.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing for adult-onset conditions without medical intervention in childhood is highly controversial.
  • Competent minors can provide informed consent for predictive genetic testing.

    • Conclusions:

    • Predictive genetic testing in children must prioritize medical benefit and psychosocial well-being.
    • Potential harms, including discrimination and stigmatization, necessitate careful risk-benefit assessment.
    • Non-medical benefits like self-knowledge and life planning are also significant considerations.