Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation.

N Ryman1, P E Jorde

  • 1Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Nils.Ryman@popgen.su.se

Molecular Ecology
|November 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary

When testing genetic differentiation across multiple gene loci, approximate statistical tests like chi-square are more powerful than exact tests for the joint hypothesis. The Bonferroni method is not recommended for this analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metapopulation effective size and conservation genetic goals for the Fennoscandian wolf (Canis lupus) population.

Heredity·2016
Same author

Estimation of effective population size in continuously distributed populations: there goes the neighborhood.

Heredity·2013
Same author

Genetic monitoring reveals temporal stability over 30 years in a small, lake-resident brown trout population.

Heredity·2012
Same author

Census (N C) and genetically effective (N e) population size in a lake-resident population of brown trout Salmo trutta.

Journal of fish biology·2011
Same author

Genetic population structure of perch Perca fluviatilis along the Swedish coast of the Baltic Sea.

Journal of fish biology·2011
Same author

Are low but statistically significant levels of genetic differentiation in marine fishes 'biologically meaningful'? A case study of coastal Atlantic cod.

Molecular ecology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genetic differentiation studies commonly use statistical tests for allele frequency homogeneity at individual gene loci.
  • Combining single-locus test results evaluates the joint null hypothesis of no allele frequency differences across populations.
  • Current strategies for joint hypothesis testing include chi-square summation and the Bonferroni technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the statistical power and alpha errors of different strategies for testing joint genetic differentiation across multiple loci.
  • To compare the performance of approximate (e.g., chi-square) versus exact tests when combined for joint hypothesis testing.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were employed to assess statistical power and realized alpha errors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study simulated scenarios involving genotyped individuals across several gene loci.
  • Performance was evaluated for chi-square summation and Bonferroni-adjusted approaches, including the 'extended' Bonferroni method.

    • Main Results:

    • The 'extended' Bonferroni approach demonstrated low statistical power and is not recommended for joint hypothesis testing.
    • Exact tests, while preferable for single-locus analysis, performed poorly when combined in existing joint testing procedures.
    • Approximate tests, such as the traditional chi-square test, were found to be preferable for addressing the joint hypothesis across multiple loci.

    Conclusions:

    • The traditional chi-square test is recommended over exact tests for evaluating joint genetic differentiation across multiple loci.
    • The Bonferroni technique is unsuitable for combining single-locus tests in this context due to low power.
    • Researchers should carefully select statistical methods based on whether they are analyzing single loci or the joint hypothesis across loci.