Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The stationarity hypothesis: an allocentric criterion in visual perception.

M Wexler1, I Lamouret, J Droulez

  • 1Laboratoire de Physiologic de la Perception et de l'Action, Collège de France, 11 pl. Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France. wexler@ccr.jussieu.fr

Vision Research
|November 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary

The visual system prioritizes stationary objects over rigid ones in structure from motion perception. Even when objects are not perfectly stationary, the brain favors the most stable interpretation, using extra-retinal information.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rat anterior cingulate neurons responsive to rule or strategy changes are modulated by the hippocampal theta rhythm and sharp-wave ripples.

The European journal of neuroscience·2024
Same author

Genetic relationships among rhizopine-producing <i>Rhizobium</i> strains.

Microbiology (Reading, England)·2021
Same author

Top-down processes and the visual perception of shape from motion.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011
Same author

Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements.

Journal of vision·2010
Same author

Processing 3D form and 3D motion: respective contributions of attention-based and stimulus-driven activity.

NeuroImage·2008
Same author

Measurement of the visual contribution to postural steadiness from the COP movement: methodology and reliability.

Gait & posture·2005

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Traditionally, extraretinal information was considered minor in spatial vision.
  • Structure from motion (SfM) studies previously equated moving observers with stationary objects and vice-versa.
  • Recent findings highlight extraretinal information's role in enhancing motion cues for stationary objects in world-fixed frames.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether stationarity is a primary criterion in structure from motion (SfM).
  • To determine if stationarity is prioritized over rigidity in visual perception.
  • To explore the role of extra-retinal information in resolving ambiguous motion stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Development of novel stimuli presenting dual interpretations: rigid/non-stationary vs. stationary/non-rigid.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two experiments were conducted involving human subjects.
  • Subjects reported perceived structure or motion under controlled viewing conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Stationary, non-rigid solutions were consistently preferred over rigid, non-stationary solutions.
    • When perfectly stationary solutions were unavailable, the visual system selected the most stationary interpretation.
    • These findings indicate a preference for stationarity in SfM.

    Conclusions:

    • Stationarity per se is a significant criterion in structure from motion perception.
    • Extra-retinal information, processed via allocentric criteria, actively contributes to reconstructing visual scenes.
    • The visual system utilizes extra-retinal cues to resolve ambiguities and prioritize stable interpretations.