Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between a Constrained Condylar and a Rotating Hinge in revision knee surgery.

P S Walker1, A R Manktelow

  • 1Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Trust, Stanmore, UK. ptrswlkr@cs.com

The Knee
|November 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Rotating Hinge total knee replacement demonstrated superior stability and clinical outcomes compared to Constrained Condylar designs. Further research is needed to address the surgical limitations of Rotating Hinges.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of single-use 3D-printed instruments for total knee arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2019
Same author

Treatment of posttraumatic elbows with a new hinge-distractor.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Analysis of an early intervention tibial component for medial osteoarthritis.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2014
Same author

Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

The Gerbich blood group system: a review.

Immunohematology·2010
Same author

Uncemented computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture femoral components in revision total hip replacement: a minimum follow-up of ten years.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2010

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Total knee replacement (TKR) aims to restore function and alleviate pain in patients with severe knee joint damage.
  • Constrained Condylar and Rotating Hinge prostheses represent different design philosophies for TKR, particularly in managing instability.
  • Evaluating the comparative performance of these TKR designs is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the mechanical performance, clinical outcomes, and radiographic findings of Constrained Condylar and Rotating Hinge total knee replacements.
  • To assess the stability and functional restoration provided by each TKR type.

Main Methods:

  • Mechanical testing to evaluate varus strength and rotational stability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Knee Society Clinical and Radiographic evaluations for objective assessment.
  • Self-assessment questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Rotating Hinges exhibited minimal varus rotation, indicating superior stability compared to Constrained Condylars (≥6 degrees varus rotation).
    • Constrained Condylars showed greater variation in femoral-tibial angles and suboptimal valgus angles due to shorter stems.
    • Patient self-assessments revealed a high correlation between operated and non-operated knees in the Rotating Hinge group, suggesting better functional adaptation.

    Conclusions:

    • Rotating Hinge total knee replacement offers enhanced stability and clinical results, potentially due to its ability to adapt to patient needs.
    • Constrained Condylar designs may lead to greater instability and variability in alignment.
    • Rotating Hinges warrant greater consideration, provided challenges like increased bone resection and longer stems can be mitigated.