Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mental models and deduction.

Philip N. Johnson-Laird1

  • 1Dept of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, 08544, Princeton, NJ, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|November 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deductive reasoning is easier when fewer mental models are needed. Errors occur when people fail to consider all possibilities or represent what is false.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • The mental-model theory explains deductive reasoning by proposing that individuals construct mental models of possibilities based on premises.
  • These models represent what is true in each possibility, and conclusions are deemed valid if they hold across all models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the number of mental models required for an inference and its perceived difficulty.
  • To identify common sources of error in deductive reasoning within the framework of mental model construction.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzed deductive inferences based on the number of mental models they necessitate.
  • Evidence was gathered on the ease or difficulty associated with inferences requiring varying numbers of models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A key finding is that inferences requiring fewer mental models are processed more easily.
  • Reasoning errors are linked to the failure to generate all relevant mental models.
  • Errors also stem from the tendency of mental models to represent truths rather than falsehoods, hindering refutation of invalid conclusions.

Conclusions:

  • The number of mental models is a critical factor influencing the cognitive load and success of deductive reasoning.
  • Understanding model construction, including representing falsehoods, is crucial for improving reasoning accuracy.