Related Experiment Videos
Axillary brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: a comparison between double- and triple-injection
1Department of Anesthesiology, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italy. salvsia@tin.it
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
|November 15, 2001
Summary
A 2-injection axillary block technique provides similar success for hand anesthesia as the 3-injection method, but is faster. The 3-injection technique is preferred when the musculocutaneous nerve is critical for surgical area anesthesia.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Regional Anesthesia
- Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Background:
- The multiple-injection axillary block technique demonstrates high success rates for brachial plexus anesthesia.
- This method can be time-consuming and technically demanding.
- Simplified techniques with fewer injections may offer advantages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and efficiency of a 2-injection versus a 3-injection axillary block technique.
- To evaluate the success rate of blocking specific nerves (radial, median, musculocutaneous, ulnar) and achieving a complete block.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind study involving 100 patients randomly assigned to either a 2-injection (radial, median nerves) or 3-injection (radial, median, musculocutaneous nerves) group.
- All injections utilized 40 mL of local anesthetic and nerve stimulation for localization.
Main Results:
- The 3-injection group showed a significantly higher success rate for blocking the musculocutaneous nerve (98% vs. 80%).
- No significant differences were observed in blocking the radial, median, and ulnar nerves between groups.
- Complete block rates were higher in the 3-injection group (90% vs. 76%), but the 2-injection technique was faster (5 vs. 6 minutes).
Conclusions:
- The 2-injection technique is a viable alternative for achieving anesthesia in the hand, comparable to the 3-injection method.
- The 3-injection technique remains essential when the musculocutaneous nerve's distribution is relevant to the surgical site.