Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Granulocyte-dependent Autoantibody-induced Skin Blistering
Published on: October 12, 2012
Can skin prick tests provoke severe allergic reactions?
Insights
Skin prick tests (SPTs) are safe and effective for diagnosing pediatric allergies. A study found no generalized allergic reactions in over 10,000 children, indicating SPTs are a reliable diagnostic tool for infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Allergy Diagnostics
- Immunology
- Dermatology
Background:
- Skin prick tests (SPTs) are widely used for diagnosing allergies.
- While generally safe, some studies report adverse reactions, though rare in children.
- Effectiveness and reliability of diagnostic tools for pediatric allergies are debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the risk of performing SPTs in infants with extensive eczema.
- To evaluate if performing SPTs in the usual manner or in duplicate poses a risk.
- To determine if excluding young babies or limiting SPTs delays diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Review of adverse reactions during SPTs in infants.
- Comparison of SPTs performed in a large cohort of children versus a smaller study group.
- Analysis of risk factors associated with SPTs in infants with eczema.
Main Results:
- A study reported 6 generalized allergic reactions in 1,152 infants under 6 months (0.17% per year) after fresh food SPTs.
- In contrast, over 10,000 children underwent SPTs in the same period without any generalized allergic reactions.
- All reported reactions were successfully treated with standard medical interventions.
Conclusions:
- SPTs are a rapid, safe, sensitive, and reliable method for diagnosing pediatric allergies.
- Performing SPTs, even in infants with extensive eczema, does not appear to be a significant risk factor.
- Delaying SPTs in young children can impede early diagnosis and management of allergic diseases.
Background:
Studies have reported adverse reactions during skin prick tests (SPTs), however such reactions are almost non existent in children. On the contrary, there are controversial data on the effectiveness and reliability of diagnostic tools. SPTs are considered as the more rapid and effective tool for the diagnosis of pediatric allergies. SPTs, when employed either correctly or with standardized extracts, are rapid, safe, sensitive, inexpensive on a per test basis and the results are reliable, since they are largely experimented.
Observations:
SPT is the more employed method for the diagnosis of atopic disease elicited by type I immune reactions, where sensitizing antibodies are present. However, we discuss a study surprisingly reporting six generalized allergic reactions after prick tests with fresh foods in infants less than 6 months of age out of 1,152 tested during three years (0.17% for each year).
Conclusions:
In this study, all reactions were treated with epinephrine and/or antihistamines, plus steroids in three cases. Purpose of the present study was to assess whether the practice of performing SPTs, either in the usual manner, or in duplicate could be a risk factor in infants with extensive eczema. Moreover, excluding young babies from STPs or even applying only one SPT each visit delays an early diagnosis. In the same period of three years, we have done SPTs in at least 10,000 children, without seeing any generalized allergic reaction.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Immune-Complex Reactions

