Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Rodent Brain Microinjection to Study Molecular Substrates of Motivated Behavior
Published on: September 16, 2015
Behavioral economics of human drug self-administration: progressive ratio versus random sequences of response
L A Giordano1, W K Bickel, T A Shahan
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA. Louis.Giordano@uvm.edu
Abstract:
Progressive-ratio (PR) schedules have been used widely to examine the relationship between drug consumption and drug price (i.e. demand curves) in the study of the behavioral economics of drug abuse. Sequential effects produced by the increasing response requirements of progressive-ratio schedules might influence the shape of demand curves for drug reinforcers. This study compared progressive ratio schedule and random sequences of ratio requirements, each incremented across sessions in a within-subject design, to determine if they produced similar behavioral economic and traditional measures of reinforcer efficacy. Self-administration of standardized cigarette puffs (70 cc each) was studied with eight smokers. Puffs were available at nine ratio requirements (e.g. 3, 100, 300, 600, 1500, 3000, 6000, 12000, 24000 responses/three puffs), presented in ascending (progressive-ratio schedule) or random sequence across daily sessions. The parameter estimates obtained on measures of reinforcing efficacy (e.g. breakpoint, peak response rates, elasticity of demand) were similar for both methods of incrementing prices. We found no evidence that PR and random sequences of fixed-ratio (FR) schedules, incremented across daily sessions, resulted in different demand curves.
Related Concept Videos
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

