Related Experiment Videos
Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting
1Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA. wmarks@memphis.edu
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 21, 2001
Summary
Remember (R)-cued primes enhance recall more than forget (F)-cued primes. However, processing targets after F-cued primes is faster, suggesting distinct memory encoding and retrieval mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Memory Research
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding memory retrieval cues is crucial for cognitive function.
- Differentiating between memory encoding for items to be remembered versus forgotten is key.
- Previous research suggests distinct processing for items intended for recall versus forgetting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how forget (F)-cued prime words influence the encoding of subsequent target words compared to remember (R)-cued primes.
- To determine if memory cues affect lexical decision performance and semantic priming.
- To explore the underlying cognitive mechanisms of memory encoding and retrieval.
Main Methods:
- Utilized lexical decision tasks across three experiments.
- Employed R-cued and F-cued prime words to influence subsequent target word processing.
- Measured recall accuracy and response times for identity and semantic priming tasks.
Main Results:
- Remember (R)-cued primes led to better recall than forget (F)-cued primes.
- Targets following F-cued primes showed faster response times in identity priming (same and different case).
- Semantic priming was observed for targets following both R-cued and F-cued primes, but with longer response times for R-cued items.
Conclusions:
- Both R-cued and F-cued items are processed to comparable representational depths.
- Inhibitory mechanisms do not hinder the encoding of F-cued items.
- Information following R-cued items experiences slower access to working memory.