Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Encoding processes and attentional inhibition in directed forgetting.

W Marks1, C L Dulaney

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA. wmarks@memphis.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Humeral fracture in arm wrestling: bone morphology as a permanent risk factor. Indications for safety measures in arm wrestling.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2014
Same author

Early brain spect in patients after minor craniocerebral trauma.

The neuroradiology journal·2013
Same author

Brain SPECT and Neuropsychological Examination in Patients with a History of Minor Craniocerebral Trauma Nine Years after Head Injury.

The neuroradiology journal·2013
Same author

Diffuse Axonal Injury: a Brief Review and Examples of the Use of Neurofunctional Imaging (Tc-99m HMPAO SPECT) in Diagnosis and Follow-up.

The neuroradiology journal·2013
Same author

Pericardiodiaphragmatic rupture and cardiac herniation after multiple blunt trauma: diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2005
Same author

New onset geriatric epilepsy: a randomized study of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine.

Neurology·2005

Remember (R)-cued primes enhance recall more than forget (F)-cued primes. However, processing targets after F-cued primes is faster, suggesting distinct memory encoding and retrieval mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding memory retrieval cues is crucial for cognitive function.
  • Differentiating between memory encoding for items to be remembered versus forgotten is key.
  • Previous research suggests distinct processing for items intended for recall versus forgetting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how forget (F)-cued prime words influence the encoding of subsequent target words compared to remember (R)-cued primes.
  • To determine if memory cues affect lexical decision performance and semantic priming.
  • To explore the underlying cognitive mechanisms of memory encoding and retrieval.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized lexical decision tasks across three experiments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed R-cued and F-cued prime words to influence subsequent target word processing.
  • Measured recall accuracy and response times for identity and semantic priming tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • Remember (R)-cued primes led to better recall than forget (F)-cued primes.
    • Targets following F-cued primes showed faster response times in identity priming (same and different case).
    • Semantic priming was observed for targets following both R-cued and F-cued primes, but with longer response times for R-cued items.

    Conclusions:

    • Both R-cued and F-cued items are processed to comparable representational depths.
    • Inhibitory mechanisms do not hinder the encoding of F-cued items.
    • Information following R-cued items experiences slower access to working memory.