Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.

I Koch1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, München, Germany. iring.koch@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Step by step: Floral structure and developmental changes to the formation of the gynostegium in Apocynaceae s.l.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2026
Same author

Secretory structures in Baccharis platypoda DC. inflorescences (Asteraceae) and characterization of the chemical composition of its secretion.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2024
Same author

Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.

Cognitive processing·2022
Same author

The outer membrane Omp85-like protein P39 influences metabolic homeostasis in mature Arabidopsis thaliana.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2018
Same author

Comparison of the cough reflex test and water swallowing test in healthy participants and neurological patients.

B-ENT·2018
Same author

Influence of hyperoxia on diastolic myocardial and arterial endothelial function.

Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc·2017

This study reveals that automatic task-set activation can lead to incidental learning without conscious awareness, influencing cognitive flexibility and task switching performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Task switching paradigms are crucial for understanding cognitive control and executive functions.
  • The interplay between automatic and intentional processes in task set activation remains an active area of research.
  • Incidental learning and its impact on cognitive performance, particularly in task switching, require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the automatic and intentional activation of task sets during cognitive tasks.
  • To examine the phenomenon of incidental task sequence learning and its relationship with task shift costs.
  • To explore the influence of temporal intervals, such as cue-stimulus interval (CSI), on task set activation and preparation effects.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a task switching paradigm across four experiments.
  • Manipulated response-cue intervals and cue-stimulus intervals (CSI) to assess automatic and intentional task set activation.
  • Measured task shift costs and incidental task sequence learning, assessing verbalizable knowledge.

    • Main Results:

    • Incidental task sequence learning occurred without conscious awareness and did not impact task shift costs, suggesting automatic task-set activation.
    • Short response-cue intervals enhanced both shift costs and learning, indicating persistent activation of the preceding task set.
    • Longer CSIs diminished learning but increased preparation effects, which reduced reaction times without being specific to task shifts.

    Conclusions:

    • Automatic task-set activation can lead to incidental learning, independent of explicit knowledge.
    • The temporal dynamics of task switching, particularly residual activation and preparation, significantly modulate performance.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility and the control of task sets.