Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2026

A Rapid and Specific Microplate Assay for the Determination of Intra- and Extracellular Ascorbate in Cultured Cells
Published on: April 11, 2014
Why do antioxidants fail to provide clinical benefit?
Ascan Warnholtz1, Thomas Münzel
1University Hospital Eppendorf, Division of Cardiology, Hamburg, Germany. muenzel@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Insights
Antioxidant supplements like vitamin E failed to improve outcomes for patients with coronary artery disease. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, however, reduced cardiac events, suggesting enzymatic inhibition is a more effective treatment strategy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Randomized trials investigating antioxidant efficacy in coronary artery disease (CAD) have yielded disappointing results.
- Vitamin E supplementation did not demonstrate any improvement in prognosis for CAD patients.
- Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have shown promise in reducing adverse coronary events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of antioxidants versus ACE inhibitors in managing coronary artery disease.
- To explore the underlying mechanisms of ACE inhibition in cardiovascular protection.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent randomized trials on antioxidant and ACE inhibitor therapies in CAD patients.
- Analysis of the impact of vitamin E on coronary-event rates.
- Assessment of the effects of ACE inhibitors on prognosis and coronary-event rates.
Main Results:
- Vitamin E supplementation showed no benefit in improving prognosis for patients with coronary artery disease.
- Treatment with ACE inhibitors led to a reduction in coronary-event rates and improved patient prognosis.
- ACE inhibition was linked to the prevention of angiotensin II formation, a key factor in superoxide production.
Conclusions:
- Enzymatic inhibition of superoxide production, as achieved by ACE inhibitors, appears more beneficial than symptomatic superoxide scavenging for treating coronary artery disease.
- Targeting the enzymatic pathways involved in atherosclerosis, rather than relying on antioxidants, may represent a superior therapeutic approach.
Abstract:
The results of recent randomized trials to test the influence of antioxidants on coronary-event rates and prognosis in patients with coronary-artery disease were disappointing. In none of these studies did the use of vitamin E improve prognosis. In contrast, treatment of coronary-artery disease with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced coronary-event rates and improved prognosis. ACE inhibition prevents the formation of angiotensin II, which has been shown to be a potent stimulus of superoxide-producing enzymes in atherosclerosis. The findings suggest that inhibition of superoxide production at enzymatic levels, rather than symptomatic superoxide scavenging, may be the better choice of treatment.
More Related Videos
09:33Imaging Approaches to Assessments of Toxicological Oxidative Stress Using Genetically-encoded Fluorogenic Sensors
Published on: February 7, 2018
03:35Rapid Quantification of Oxidized and Reduced Forms of Glutathione Using Ortho -phthalaldehyde in Cultured Mammalian Cells In Vitro
Published on: June 28, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Vitamins
Bioactivation and Tissue Toxicity
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance