Is clopidogrel superior to aspirin in secondary prevention of vascular disease?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Isolation of Intrapulmonary Artery and Smooth Muscle Cells to Investigate Vascular Responses
Published on: June 8, 2022
1University Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. A.Algra@neuro.azu.nl
Insights
Clopidogrel offers modest benefits for secondary vascular event prevention, particularly in peripheral arterial disease. While generally safe, rare thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura cases warrant caution.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Clinical Medicine
- Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Background:
- Thienopyridines, including clopidogrel and ticlopidine, are used for secondary prevention of vascular disease.
- Comparing their efficacy and safety against aspirin is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relative efficacy of clopidogrel and ticlopidine versus aspirin in secondary vascular disease prevention.
- To assess the safety profiles of these antiplatelet agents.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CURE) trial data.
- Stratification of results based on qualifying vascular disorders: myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease.
Main Results:
- Clopidogrel demonstrated a modest overall benefit in reducing vascular events compared to aspirin.
- Efficacy varied by condition: significant benefit in peripheral arterial disease (+23.8%), neutral in ischemic stroke (+7.3%), and potential harm in myocardial infarction (-3.7%).
- Ticlopidine showed similar trends after brain ischemia; clopidogrel's safety profile was comparable to aspirin but superior to ticlopidine, barring rare thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) events.
Conclusions:
- Clopidogrel provides a modest benefit in secondary vascular event prevention, with notable efficacy in peripheral arterial disease.
- The differential efficacy across various vascular conditions necessitates careful patient selection.
- While generally safe, the risk of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel requires ongoing vigilance.
Abstract:
The cornerstone in clinical evidence of the relative efficacy of thienopyridines (clopidogrel, ticlopidine) versus aspirin in the secondary prevention of vascular disease is the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events trial. This trial showed a modest benefit in the reduction of vascular events by clopidogrel. The results differed according to qualifying disorder: myocardial infarction, -3.7%; ischaemic stroke, +7.3%; and peripheral arterial disease, +23.8% (P = 0.042). Similar results were found for ticlopidine after brain ischaemia. The safety of clopidogrel appears to be similar to that of aspirin and better than that of ticlopidine. However, the recent report of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in association with clopidogrel causes concern.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Active Transport
Seedless Vascular Plants
Secondary Healthcare System

