Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Medical errors: inevitable but preventable].

R W Giard1

  • 1Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid, locatie Clara, afd. Klinische Pathologie, Postbus 9119, 3007 AC Rotterdam. giard@wanadoo.nl

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|November 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Sensitivity and speed of cell and tissue pre-diagnosis among breast cancer patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in two hospitals, determined with the aid of PALGA data].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Evaluation of frozen sections and cytological diagnosis during surgery].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[The yield of breast cancer screening: the importance of observational data and the problems of bias].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Screening: careful considerations versus commercial medicine].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2003
Same author

[Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2002
Same author

[Diagnostic image (68). Retrosternal struma].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2002

Medical errors are common, but understanding their causes requires considering clinical context, not just outcomes. Improving organizational factors is key to reducing medical errors and learning from mistakes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical quality and safety
  • Healthcare systems analysis

Context:

  • Medical errors are frequently reported in public media, with studies indicating high error rates.
  • Assessing medical errors necessitates understanding the clinical context, including decision-making intentions and rationale.

Purpose:

  • To highlight the methodological challenges in studying medical error frequency and causes.
  • To emphasize the limitations of outcome-based reviews without considering clinical context.
  • To advocate for a shift from personal blame to organizational improvement in addressing medical errors.

Summary:

  • Studying medical errors is complex, requiring analysis beyond simple outcome reviews.
  • Preventability of medical errors is difficult to interpret and often subjective.
  • Organizational factors are crucial for error reduction, more so than individual blame.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • Promotes a systems-based approach to medical error analysis and prevention.
  • Encourages a culture of open reporting and learning from mistakes within healthcare.
  • Suggests that focusing on organizational improvements can lead to reduced medical error incidence.