Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mini-laparoscopic versus laparoscopic approach to appendectomy.

G Mostafa1, B D Matthews, R F Sing

  • 1Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, PO Box 32861, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232-22861, USA. Gamal.Mostafa@carolinashealthcare.org

BMC Surgery
|November 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for postoperative analgesia after open total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised comparative trial.

Anaesthesia reports·2026
Same author

Machine learning, deep learning and hernia surgery. Are we pushing the limits of abdominal core health? A qualitative systematic review.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Preservation of deep epigastric perforators during anterior component separation technique (ACST) results in equivalent wound complications compared to transversus abdominis release (TAR).

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2023
Same author

National epidemiologic trends (2008-2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2022
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Perioperative optimization in complex abdominal wall hernias: Delphi consensus statement.

BJS open·2021
Same journal

Efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement suture in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle-low rectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched cohort study.

BMC surgery·2026
Same journal

Clinical profile, outcomes and mortality determinants among emergency general surgery patients in a Latin American tertiary hospital: a retrospective registry-based cross-sectional study.

BMC surgery·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of open Ramstedt's pyoloromyotomy among infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis patients at governmental hospitals in Amhara Region, Ethiopia, 2023.

BMC surgery·2026
Same journal

A prospective observational study comparing conventional lateral border transfascial mesh fixation versus midline transfascial suturing in laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for umbilical hernia- a pilot study.

BMC surgery·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a wireless intelligent endoscopic system versus a conventional wired system: a retrospective study.

BMC surgery·2026
Same journal

The effect of depression comorbid with alcohol use disorder on postoperative morbidity of patients undergoing resection of upper gastrointestinal and pancreatic tumors: a study based on a national inpatient sample.

BMC surgery·2026
See all related articles

Needlescopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive technique using 2-mm instruments, offers faster recovery and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. This approach is safe and effective for acute appendicitis when performed by experienced surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency.
  • Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy is the standard surgical approach.
  • Needlescopic surgery offers potential advantages in reducing invasiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of 2-mm needlescopic instruments for appendectomy.
  • To compare the outcomes of needlescopic appendectomy with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study comparing two groups of patients undergoing appendectomy.
  • Group 1: 15 patients underwent needlescopic appendectomy.
  • Group 2 (Control): 21 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of demographic data, operative findings, complications, pain management, hospital stay, and recovery.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in patient demographics or operative findings between groups.
    • No conversions to open surgery or postoperative complications in either group.
    • Needlescopic group showed significantly shorter operative time, reduced narcotic use, shorter hospital stay, and quicker return to work.

    Conclusions:

    • Needlescopic appendectomy is a safe and effective surgical approach.
    • This technique leads to significantly shorter postoperative convalescence and faster recovery.
    • Experienced surgeons can successfully implement the needlescopic technique for appendectomy.