Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual search in depth.

E McSorley1, J M Findlay

  • 1Department of Psychology, Centre for Vision and Visual Cognition, University of Durham, DH1 3LE, Durham, UK. eugene.mcsorley@durham.ac.uk

Vision Research
|November 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Surgical or Endovascular Treatment of MCA Aneurysms: An Agreement Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

Reply.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

Transcranial Doppler Velocities and Angiographic Vasospasm after SAH: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

Reliability of the Diagnosis of Cerebral Vasospasm Using Catheter Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Inter- and Intraobserver Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

A randomized trial of endovascular versus surgical management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Interim results from ISAT2.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2019
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Visual search accuracy for conjunction targets (40%) was lower than for single features (70%), with longer reaction times. However, parallel processing of visual information suggests efficient target selection.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual search involves locating targets among distractors.
  • Feature integration theory posits that simple features are processed in parallel, while conjunctions require serial processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy and latency of saccade localization for targets defined by single features versus feature conjunctions.
  • To explore the underlying visual processing mechanisms during visual search tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual search task, identifying targets defined by orientation, depth, or a conjunction of both.
  • Eye movements (saccades) were recorded to analyze accuracy and latency of target localization.
  • Search accuracy and reaction times were compared between single-feature and conjunction search conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • First saccade accuracy was approximately 70% for single-feature targets (orientation or depth).
  • First saccade accuracy significantly decreased to about 40% for conjunction targets.
  • Conjunction search exhibited longer average saccade latencies compared to single-feature search.
  • Some individuals demonstrated efficient conjunction target localization with short-latency saccades.

Conclusions:

  • Visual search for conjunction targets is less accurate and slower than for single features.
  • The findings suggest parallel processing of visual information, challenging strictly serial models for conjunction search.
  • Individual differences in visual search efficiency may reflect variations in parallel processing capabilities.