Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Local therapy for rectal cancer.

B C Visser1, M G Varma, M L Welton

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Surgical Oncology
|November 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Faecal incontinence in men referred for specialty care: a cross-sectional study.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2015
Same author

Changes in spleen volume after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Clinical radiology·2012
Same author

Development and assessment of the constipation-related disability scale.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2011
Same author

Pelvic floor disorders and quality of life in women with self-reported irritable bowel syndrome.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2009
Same author

Pathological response after chemoradiation for T3 rectal cancer.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2009
Same author

Controversies in the management of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Minerva chirurgica·2008
Same journal

Comparative safety of postoperative HIPEC with recombinant mutant TNF-α versus paclitaxel for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis: a randomized controlled trial.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Early postoperative hospital exposome stress, multisystem recovery trajectories, and long-term oncologic outcomes after curative colorectal cancer surgery.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of age in adult primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Insights from the SEER database.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Associations of latent profiles of resilience and fear of progression with discharge symptoms and postoperative frailty among patients undergoing lung resection: A longitudinal study.

Surgical oncology·2026
Same journal

Plastic surgeon or surgical oncologist: Impact of surgical training background on outcomes in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction.

Surgical oncology·2026
See all related articles

Local therapy offers an effective, low-morbidity alternative to radical resection for early rectal cancer, avoiding colostomy. Transanal excision is preferred for its favorable outcomes and low complication rates in selected patients.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Radical resection for rectal cancer can lead to significant morbidity, including the need for a colostomy.
  • Local therapy presents a less invasive alternative for selected early-stage rectal cancer patients.
  • Various local therapy techniques exist, including transanal excision, dorsal approaches, and endoscopic methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of local therapy as an alternative to radical resection for early rectal cancer.
  • To identify the most suitable local therapy technique and patient selection criteria.
  • To compare outcomes of local therapy with traditional radical resection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing data on local therapy techniques for early rectal cancer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of patient selection criteria, including tumor stage (T1, T2) and histologic features.
  • Comparison of complication rates, local recurrence, and survival rates between local therapy and radical resection.

    • Main Results:

    • Transanal excision is favored among local techniques due to low complication rates and good outcomes.
    • Local excision alone is suitable for T1 lesions with favorable histology; T2 lesions may require adjuvant chemoradiation.
    • Local therapy is not recommended for advanced (T3-T4), poorly differentiated, or otherwise high-risk tumors.
    • For carefully selected patients, local excision achieves recurrence and survival rates comparable to radical resection.

    Conclusions:

    • Local therapy, particularly transanal excision, is a viable and effective option for selected early rectal cancer patients, minimizing morbidity and avoiding colostomy.
    • Close surveillance is crucial after local excision to detect recurrence.
    • Radical resection can salvage most local recurrences, but long-term outcomes require further investigation.