Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in biomedical publications.

R D Kempers1

  • 1Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Human Fertility (Cambridge, England)
|November 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Where are we going?

Fertility and sterility·1994
Same author

Writing and interpreting medical literature.

Fertility and sterility·1993
Same author

Benign deception: fragmentation, overlapping publications, and loose authorship.

Fertility and sterility·1989
Same author

The effect of deglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin on corpora luteal function in healthy women.

Fertility and sterility·1988
Same author

Citation classics: most-cited articles from Fertility and Sterility.

Fertility and sterility·1987
Same author

Cervical cerclage. 20 years' experience at the Mayo Clinic.

Minnesota medicine·1983
Same journal

Investigating the effect of preconception untreated subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH above normal range and below 6.0 mIU/L) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Does ICSI timing impact cumulative live birth and perinatal outcomes - a cohort study.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Association between dietary quality indices and female infertility: a population-based study using NHANES 2013-2020.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Contact experiences among donor conception parties: donor conceived persons, donors, parents and same-donor siblings - a mixed methods systematic review.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Single mothers by choice in Hungary: motivations for solo motherhood and the importance of genetic ties.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Donor conception and family connection: beyond genetic reductionism in the postgenomic era.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026
See all related articles

This article addresses key ethical challenges in biomedical publishing, including authorship disputes, peer review integrity, duplicate publications, and conflicts of interest, to uphold research accuracy and journal credibility.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Scientific publishing
  • Academic ethics

Background:

  • Peer-reviewed biomedical journals are crucial for disseminating accurate and significant information.
  • Ethical issues can emerge from both editorial and research communities.
  • Maintaining high ethical standards is vital for the integrity of scientific literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss prevalent ethical issues in biomedical publications.
  • To emphasize the importance of addressing these challenges to ensure research validity.
  • To encourage active participation in upholding ethical standards.

Main Methods:

  • The article reviews common ethical dilemmas encountered in scientific publishing.
  • It focuses on four primary areas: authorship, peer review, duplicate publication, and conflicts of interest.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical considerations within each area are examined in detail.

    • Main Results:

    • Authorship issues encompass multiple authors, misconduct, guest/honorary authorship, order, and credit.
    • Peer review challenges include confidentiality, bias, and reviewer conflicts of interest.
    • Duplicate publication and conflicts of interest can compromise journal reputation and author integrity.

    Conclusions:

    • Increased awareness of these ethical issues is essential for all stakeholders.
    • Proactive engagement in establishing and enforcing ethical standards is necessary.
    • Upholding ethical practices ensures the trustworthiness and impact of biomedical publications.