Dysphonia subsequent to severe traumatic brain injury: comparative perceptual, acoustic and electroglottographic...

We tested the applicability of the Goettinger Hoarseness Diagram (GHD) for quantitative evaluation of voice disorders after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compared the obtained data with those from established voice analysis systems such as the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP), electroglottography (EGG) and perceptual ratings using sustained vowel productions from 10 patients with TBI dysarthrophonia at late stages postinjury and of 10 healthy control speakers. Statistical analyses revealed significant intergroup differences with respect to various acoustic and perceptual measures, i.e., irregularity component, noise component, noise-to-harmonic ratio, shimmer, jitter, roughness, creakiness, strained-strangledness, hypernasality. By contrast, the considered EGG estimates, i.e., open quotient and speed quotient, did not allow for separation of patients and controls. In addition, the two GHD components exhibited close correlations to perceived roughness and creakiness, on the one hand, and breathiness and, to some degree, nasality, on the other, whereas the MDVP parameters failed to differentiate between these two perceptual modes of phonation.