Evaluation of cell proliferation and cell death based assays in chemosensitivity testing

C Gerçel-Taylor1, M A Ackermann, D D Taylor

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY 40202, USA. catayl01@gwise.louisville.edu

Anticancer Research
|November 29, 2001
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Evaluating drug sensitivity testing (DST) for ovarian cancer revealed that the sulforhodamine-B (SRB) assay is a sensitive predictor of chemotherapy response, unlike other tested methods.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Cell Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Drug sensitivity testing (DST) aims to predict chemotherapy response but has limited clinical success.
  • Ovarian cancer treatment relies on predicting patient response to agents like cisplatin and paclitaxel.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate cell proliferation and apoptosis assays for determining ovarian cancer cell sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel.
  • To compare the efficacy of sulforhodamine-B (SRB), tritiated thymidine, diphenylamine, and DNA histone ELISA assays.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four ovarian cancer cell lines.
  • Determined LD10-LD90 doses using viability assays.
  • Compared cell proliferation assays (SRB, [3H] thymidine) and cell death assays (diphenylamine, DNA histone ELISA).

Main Results:

  • The SRB assay demonstrated consistent sensitivity.
  • DNA histone ELISA correlated with viability at high drug doses; diphenylamine assay showed similar trends.
  • The [3H] thymidine assay lacked sensitivity and produced false positives.

Conclusions:

  • Significant differences exist among the evaluated in vitro assays.
  • Most tested assays are better indicators of drug resistance than sensitivity.
  • Further research is required to establish robust correlations between in vitro testing and in vivo patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos