Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic results from Wiktor stent treatment for true bifurcation narrowings
A Anzuini1, C Briguori, S Rosanio
1Vita e Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. anzangelo@yahoo.com
Insights
A simple approach to coronary artery bifurcation lesions, involving main vessel stenting and side branch balloon angioplasty, demonstrated a lower side branch restenosis rate compared to complex stenting techniques. This suggests simpler strategies may offer better long-term outcomes for these complex lesions.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- True bifurcation lesions pose significant challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Optimal stent strategy for these complex lesions remains a subject of debate.
- Wiktor stent implantation was utilized in this comparative study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of a simple PCI strategy versus a complex stenting technique for true bifurcation lesions.
- To evaluate restenosis rates and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months.
- To determine the optimal approach for managing true coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 90 patients with true bifurcation lesions treated with Wiktor stents from January 1996 to December 1998.
- Group I (n=45): Simple approach (main vessel stenting, side branch balloon angioplasty).
- Group II (n=45): Complex approach ('T' stenting technique for both main and side branches).
Main Results:
- Both strategies achieved high procedural and angiographic success rates (100% and 95.6%, respectively).
- The simple approach (Group I) showed a significantly lower side branch restenosis rate (12.5% vs. 37.5% in Group II, p<0.05).
- No significant differences were observed in in-hospital or 12-month major cardiac events, though event-free probability favored the simple approach (80% vs. 61%).
Conclusions:
- A simple PCI strategy for true bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower risk of side branch restenosis.
- Complex stenting techniques ('T' stenting) do not appear to offer advantages in terms of early or long-term outcomes or overall restenosis rates.
- The findings suggest that a simplified approach may be preferable for managing true bifurcation lesions to reduce restenosis in the side branch.
Abstract:
From January 1996 to December 1998, 90 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary angioplasty with Wiktor stent implantation in our centers. In 1 group (group I, n = 45), a simple approach (main vessel stenting and balloon angioplasty of the side branch) was pursued. In the other group (group II, n = 45), both the main vessel and the side branch were stented ("T" technique). There was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic characteristics between the 2 groups. Angiographic and procedural successes were 100% and 95.6%, respectively, in both groups. Angiographic results for the side branch were better in group II than in group I. In-hospital and long-term (12 month) major cardiac events were similar in the 2 groups. Target lesion revascularization was 15.5% in group I and 35.5% in group II (p = 0.12). In the main vessel, restenosis rate was 12.5% in group I and 25% in group II (p = 0.15). In the side branch, restenosis rate was 37.5% in group II and 12.5% in group I (p = <0.05; odds ratio 2.42; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 6.26). Event-free probability at 12 months was 61% in group II and 80% in group I (p = 0.10). When dealing with true bifurcation lesions, a simple strategy is associated with a lower risk of restenosis in the side branch. In contrast, a complex approach does not appear to give any benefit in terms of early or long-term outcome or restenosis rate.

