Quantification of ultrasound contrast agent response: comparison of continuous wave Doppler and power Doppler to...

Our goal was to compare two quantification methods of ultrasound contrast agents available in clinical practice [continuous wave Doppler intensity (CWDI) and power Doppler intensity (PWDI)] to the reference technique (radio-frequency analysis) with a simple recirculating flow phantom using a renal dialysis cartridge. Measurements were made at different doses of perflenapent emulsion and BR1. Cineloops of power Doppler images were recorded using a clinically available ultrasound unit (HDI 3000). Simultaneously, integrated backscatter (IBS) was measured by analysis of radiofrequency signals, whereas Doppler signal intensity was measured with a continuous wave Doppler device. A linear relationship was found between CWDI and IBS and between PWDI and IBS when R(2) was calculated for each pair of parameters injection-by-injection. Results are summarized by the average R(2) for all injections between CWDI and IBS (BR1: R(2) = 0.93 +/- 0.05, perflenapent emulsion: R(2) = 0.94 +/- 0.03) and between PWDI and IBS (BR1: R(2) = 0.88 +/- 0.07, perflenapent emulsion: R(2) = 0.79 +/- 0.09). However, for all data obtained from all different injected doses and for both contrast agents, there was considerable variation of CWDI and PWDI values measured for a given value of IBS. In conclusion, for a fixed microbubble population, CWDI and PWDI can be proposed for quantification of USCA. However, their important variations observed at each dose make it difficult to link a single value of PWDI or CWDI or IBS to a single microbubble distribution composition.