Comparative aspects of gait, scaling and mechanics in mammals

In phylogenetically based systematics, Mammalia is the nomenclatural term which designates the clade stemming from the most recent common ancestry of monotremes and theria [, Sys. Biol. 43 (1994) 497]. Considering that locomotor performance is a prevalent function to provide the necessary conditions to survive and transmit genes, it may be questioned if the diverse types of locomotion exhibited by extant mammals could have played a role in their evolution, or have only followed it. We may look after the structural and behavioural features which are involved in mammal locomotion compared to other tetrapods and test if they fit with the proposed phylogeny. Several factors may be checked: scaling effect in relation to gravitational constraints; geometrical distribution of masses in the body, and relative mechanical role of the limbs in the production of the external forces necessary to forward motion. Classically, it was thought that the fastest gaits used by terrestrial mammals were based upon a unique kind of limb motion co-ordination, called asymmetrical gaits, which in turn may be thought to be related to a peculiar neuronal wiring. Kinematic analysis brings an insight to this topic. Is the search for an ancestral mammalian locomotor pattern judicious? Notice the small size of many of the first mammals and their probable locomotor plasticity. (relation between grain size of the elements within the substrate and the organism scale). At a small size, the gravitational constraint is less important, and the distinction between terrestrial and arboreal has probably no sense when the limbs are the principal motor elements. There remains the importance of the geometrical distribution of body elements, the proportions of the limbs and of the head-neck complex, the tail merely as an appendix, a set of factors which may have generated the frame of constraints within which diverse locomotor modes have evolved.