Comparison of myocardial tissue Doppler with transmitral flow Doppler in left ventricular hypertrophy
Insights
Myocardial Doppler measurements, including isovolumetric relaxation time and A-wave duration, are more sensitive than mitral inflow Doppler for detecting diastolic dysfunction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. These findings aid in assessing cardiac health.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Diastolic Function Assessment
Background:
- Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can impair diastolic function, even with normal systolic function.
- Accurate assessment of diastolic dysfunction is crucial for managing patients with LVH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the most effective echocardiographic measurements for assessing diastolic function in patients with LVH and normal systolic function.
- To compare the utility of myocardial Doppler velocities versus mitral inflow Doppler parameters.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function using myocardial Doppler and mitral inflow pulsed wave Doppler.
- Comparison of measurements in healthy volunteers, patients without LVH, and patients with LVH.
Main Results:
- Myocardial A-wave duration and isovolumetric relaxation time were significantly increased in patients with LVH.
- Myocardial E-wave velocity was significantly decreased in patients with LVH.
- Myocardial isovolumetric relaxation time and A-wave duration showed the strongest correlation with posterior wall thickness on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions:
- Myocardial Doppler parameters, specifically isovolumetric relaxation time and A-wave duration, are more sensitive than mitral Doppler inflow parameters for detecting abnormal left ventricular relaxation in LVH.
- These myocardial Doppler measurements are valuable tools for assessing diastolic function in this patient population.
Abstract:
We sought to determine the most useful echocardiographic measurements for assessment of diastolic function in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and normal systolic function. We compared myocardial Doppler velocities of the basal inferoposterior wall with mitral inflow pulsed wave Doppler velocities in 11 healthy volunteers (age, 36 +/- 6 years), 25 patients (age, 64 +/- 14 years) without LVH, and 37 patients (age, 67 +/- 14 years) with LVH and otherwise normal echocardiograms. The discriminatory measurements were myocardial A-wave duration (120 +/- 18 versus 98 +/- 20 and 92 +/- 12 ms, P <.0001), myocardial isovolumetric relaxation time (124 +/- 45 versus 95 +/- 48 and 78 +/- 25 ms, P =.0035), mitral A-wave velocity (0.98 +/- 0.37 versus 0.73 +/- 0.28 m/s and 0.61 +/- 0.22 m/s, P =.009), and mitral E-wave deceleration time (257 +/- 93 versus 201 +/- 85 ms and 184 +/- 83 ms, P =.015), which were significantly increased, and myocardial E-wave velocity (0.84 +/- 0.04 m/s versus 0.13 +/- 0.03 m/s and 0.14 +/- 0.03 m/s, P <.0001), which was significantly decreased, in patients with LVH compared with patients without LVH and normal volunteers, respectively. Left ventricular posterior wall thickness correlated with myocardial isovolumetric relaxation time (r = 0.52, P <.0001) and myocardial A-wave duration (r = 0.59, P <.0001), negatively with myocardial E wave (r = -0.43, P <.0001), and showed no correlation with mitral inflow parameters except mitral inflow A wave (r = 0.43, P =.002). On multivariate analysis using these variables, myocardial isovolumetric relaxation time (P =.0014) and A-wave duration (P =.001) were the only 2 variables that correlated with posterior wall thickness (multiple R = 0.71). In the presence of LVH and preserved left ventricular systolic function, myocardial relaxation time and velocities are more sensitive than mitral Doppler inflow parameters in detecting abnormal left ventricular relaxation.
More Related Videos
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
08:57Pulsed Wave Doppler Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction in the ZSF-1 Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease
Published on: May 22, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
