Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 1. Biosafety Level 4 Suit Laboratory Suite Entry and Exit Procedures
Published on: October 3, 2016
[Notification according to the law for protection against infections]
1Braunschweig.
Abstract:
Since January 1st 2001, the Law for Protection Against Infections decrees the duty of notification along two tracks, on the one hand by notification of infectious diseases and on the other hand by reporting the pathogens. However, the names of pathogens change due to scientific progress. Furthermore, these names include in some cases not only harmful agents of infectious diseases but also inoffensive organisms, i. e. Giardia lamblia. There are also problems in the notification of other pathogens such as Brucella sp., Campylobacter sp., Chlamydia psittaci,Clostridium botulinum, Cryptosporidium parvum, Leptospira interrogans, Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and similar agents, Norwalk-like viruses, Salmonella Paratyphi, Treponema pallidum, Trichinella spiralis and pathogenic serovars of Yersinia enterocolitica. Finally, the abandonment of notification for glanders, lymphogranuloma venereum, ulcus molle and variola appears to be risky, the reasons being partly unconvincing and contradictory.
Insights
Germany's Infection Protection Law requires reporting infectious diseases and pathogens. However, evolving pathogen names and reporting inconsistencies, like with Giardia lamblia, pose challenges for accurate public health surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Microbiology
Background:
- The German Law for Protection Against Infections (2001) mandates dual reporting: infectious diseases and their causative pathogens.
- Scientific advancements lead to frequent changes in pathogen nomenclature.
- Current reporting systems face challenges with pathogen identification and classification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the complexities and limitations of the current German infectious disease and pathogen reporting system.
- To identify specific pathogens and diseases that present reporting difficulties.
- To evaluate the implications of abandoning notification for certain diseases.
Main Methods:
- Review of the German Law for Protection Against Infections (2001) and related amendments.
- Analysis of pathogen nomenclature changes and their impact on reporting accuracy.
- Case study examination of problematic pathogen reporting (e.g., Giardia lamblia, Brucella sp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis).
- Assessment of the rationale behind the removal of certain diseases from mandatory notification.
Main Results:
- Pathogen name changes create ambiguity, potentially including non-pathogenic organisms (e.g., Giardia lamblia).
- Specific bacterial (Brucella sp., Campylobacter sp., Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis), viral (Norwalk-like viruses), and parasitic (Trichinella spiralis) pathogens present significant reporting challenges.
- The discontinuation of mandatory reporting for glanders, lymphogranuloma venereum, ulcus molle, and variola is deemed potentially risky due to insufficient justification.
Conclusions:
- The current pathogen reporting system requires revision to accommodate scientific progress and improve accuracy.
- Standardization of pathogen identification and reporting criteria is crucial for effective disease surveillance.
- Revisiting the decision to de-list certain infectious diseases is recommended to maintain comprehensive public health protection.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Signaling
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...

