[Notification according to the law for protection against infections]

H E Müller1

  • 1Braunschweig.

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband Der Arzte Des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))
|December 6, 2001
PubMed

Insights

Germany's Infection Protection Law requires reporting infectious diseases and pathogens. However, evolving pathogen names and reporting inconsistencies, like with Giardia lamblia, pose challenges for accurate public health surveillance.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • The German Law for Protection Against Infections (2001) mandates dual reporting: infectious diseases and their causative pathogens.
  • Scientific advancements lead to frequent changes in pathogen nomenclature.
  • Current reporting systems face challenges with pathogen identification and classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the complexities and limitations of the current German infectious disease and pathogen reporting system.
  • To identify specific pathogens and diseases that present reporting difficulties.
  • To evaluate the implications of abandoning notification for certain diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the German Law for Protection Against Infections (2001) and related amendments.
  • Analysis of pathogen nomenclature changes and their impact on reporting accuracy.
  • Case study examination of problematic pathogen reporting (e.g., Giardia lamblia, Brucella sp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis).
  • Assessment of the rationale behind the removal of certain diseases from mandatory notification.

Main Results:

  • Pathogen name changes create ambiguity, potentially including non-pathogenic organisms (e.g., Giardia lamblia).
  • Specific bacterial (Brucella sp., Campylobacter sp., Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis), viral (Norwalk-like viruses), and parasitic (Trichinella spiralis) pathogens present significant reporting challenges.
  • The discontinuation of mandatory reporting for glanders, lymphogranuloma venereum, ulcus molle, and variola is deemed potentially risky due to insufficient justification.

Conclusions:

  • The current pathogen reporting system requires revision to accommodate scientific progress and improve accuracy.
  • Standardization of pathogen identification and reporting criteria is crucial for effective disease surveillance.
  • Revisiting the decision to de-list certain infectious diseases is recommended to maintain comprehensive public health protection.

Related Concept Videos

Bacterial Signaling01:30

Bacterial Signaling

Bacterial signaling can occur within bacteria (intracellular) or between bacteria (intercellular). At times, a group of bacteria behaves like a community. To achieve this, they engage in quorum sensing, the perception of higher cell density that causes changes in gene expression. Quorum sensing involves both extracellular and intracellular signaling. The signaling cascade starts with a molecule called an autoinducer (AI). Individual bacteria produce AIs that move out of the bacterial cell...
Infection01:20

Infection

When a pathogen enters the body and reproduces, it can cause an infection, damage body cells, and cause illness symptoms that eventually lead to disease. Therefore, its prevention requires breaking the chain of infection.
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment01:25

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment

Transmission-based precautions are for patients infected or suspected to be infected (or colonized) with organisms posing a significant risk to others. The transmission precautions include airborne and protective environment precautions.
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets01:17

Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets

Transmission-based precautions are for patients known to be infected or suspected to be infected or colonized with organisms that pose a significant risk to others. Some transmission-based precautions include contact, enteric, and droplet.
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...