Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why alternative medicine cannot be evidence-based.

M R Tonelli1, T C Callahan

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA. tonelli@u.washington.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|December 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2002
Same author

Empowering the individual with ALS at the end-of-life: disease-specific advance care planning.

Muscle & nerve·2001
Same author

The limits of evidence-based medicine.

Respiratory care·2001
Same author

A phase I study of aerosolized administration of tgAAVCF to cystic fibrosis subjects with mild lung disease.

Human gene therapy·2001
Same author

New and emerging therapies for pulmonary complications of cystic fibrosis.

Drugs·2001
Same author

Too much ethics, not enough medicine: clarifying the role of clinical expertise for the clinical ethics consultant.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2001
Same journal

The Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program: A Model for Increasing Diversity in Surgical Specialties.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Toward a global ecosystem for health professions education: harnessing open educational resources and generative AI with shared governance.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Naming learner agency at the bedside: FPTAL (from passive reception to active learning) as a dialogic bridge.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Fostering conversation and co-regulation: how medical students experience co-creating narrative feedback.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Understanding accelerated 3-year MD program graduates: key considerations for residency directors.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
See all related articles

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) demands rigorous trials for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, CAM

Area of Science:

  • Integrative medicine
  • Epistemology in healthcare
  • Medical research methodologies

Background:

  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the dominant paradigm in Western medicine.
  • EBM proponents advocate for controlled clinical trials to validate complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) efficacy.
  • This demand reflects a philosophical stance to establish EBM's epistemology as the sole arbiter of medical knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the universal applicability of EBM's epistemological framework to CAM.
  • To explore the incompatibility of EBM's population-based methods with individualized CAM approaches.
  • To advocate for the development of CAM-specific methodologies for assessing efficacy and causality.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of EBM and CAM epistemologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the theoretical underpinnings of different medical systems.
  • Discussion of the limitations of controlled clinical trials for certain CAM modalities.

    • Main Results:

    • Rigorous controlled trials, central to EBM, may not be scientifically necessary or appropriate for all CAM practices.
    • CAM's focus on individualistic healing and non-measurable concepts (e.g., Qi) challenges EBM's assessment framework.
    • Current CAM knowledge development methods have limitations, including bias and varied interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • EBM's demand for controlled trials for CAM is a philosophical, not scientific, necessity.
    • CAM requires developing its own coherent methods for assessing causality and efficacy.
    • Orthodox medicine should accept diverse epistemic approaches and demand clear explanations of CAM's methods rather than imposing EBM standards.