Related Experiment Videos
Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction
P Udomkiat1, L D Dorr, Y Y Won
1The Arthritis Institute at Centinela Hospital, Inglewood, California 90301, USA.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|December 12, 2001
Summary
Revision hip surgery using acetabular metal supports showed a 17% mechanical failure rate. Bone defects greater than 60% require bulk allograft to prevent support migration and dislocation risks.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Acetabular revision surgery aims to restore hip joint stability and function.
- Metal ring supports are utilized to reconstruct acetabular defects.
- High failure rates necessitate understanding of failure mechanisms and improved surgical techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the mechanical failure rates and modes of acetabular metal ring supports (Mueller, Ganz, Burch-Schneider) in hip revision surgery.
- To identify risk factors for mechanical failure and dislocation.
- To provide recommendations for optimizing acetabular reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 64 hip revisions performed by a single surgeon.
- Use of Mueller ring, Ganz ring, or Burch-Schneider cage with cemented polyethylene cups.
- Analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes, including aseptic loosening and dislocation.
Main Results:
- Overall mechanical failure rate was 17% (11/64), primarily due to aseptic loosening and migration.
- Acetabular support migration occurred with >60% superior bone defects filled with cement or particulate graft.
- Dislocation occurred in 23% (15/64) of hips, requiring reoperation in 8% (5/64).
Conclusions:
- Acetabular metal ring supports have a significant mechanical failure rate, influenced by the extent of bone defect and graft material used.
- Optimal support fixation requires >60% contact with host bone, utilizing bulk allograft for larger defects.
- Constrained liners are recommended for patients with trochanteric nonunion and significant abductor weakness to reduce dislocation risk.