Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study.

A Heijl, C E Krakau

    Acta Ophthalmologica
    |June 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.

    Eye (London, England)·2011
    Same author

    Focusing on glaucoma progression and the clinical importance of progression rate measurement: a review.

    Eye (London, England)·2010
    Same author

    The malmo high risk ocular hypertension study.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Arcuate cluster analysis in glaucoma perimetry.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

    The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
    Same author

    Visual acuity and perimetry as measures of visual function in diabetic macular oedema.

    Diabetologia·2005
    Same journal

    En face localization of retinal telangiectatic capillaries using OCT compared with ICG angiography in chronic vascular macular oedema.

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    Same journal

    Usher syndrome-related visual impairment in Finland: A 35-year nationwide register-based study (1985-2019).

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    Same journal

    Three years of ocular proton therapy in the Netherlands, clinical results.

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    Same journal

    Risk factors for acquisition and severity of Acanthamoeba and Fusarium keratitis in contact lens users-A case-control and clinical-epidemiological study, 2009-2020.

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    Same journal

    Distinguish polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy through choroidal alterations: A systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    Same journal

    Ocular blood flow and retinal oxygen saturation measurements in central retinal artery occlusion.

    Acta ophthalmologica·2026
    See all related articles

    A new automatic static perimetry instrument was developed for vision testing. The study found that while subjects understood the test, frequent errors necessitated adjustments to the testing program for accuracy.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Medical instrumentation

    Background:

    • Static perimetry is crucial for assessing visual field defects.
    • Existing methods may have limitations in automation and reproducibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and evaluate an automated static perimetry instrument.
    • To assess the feasibility and initial performance of the new device.

    Main Methods:

    • Construction of a 14-point static perimetry instrument controlled by a computer.
    • Subjects responded to light stimuli via push-buttons.
    • Pilot study to investigate instrument performance and user comprehension.

    Main Results:

    • The instrument was generally understood by subjects.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Frequent subject errors ('blunders') were observed, requiring program adjustments.
  • Test logic complexity influenced reproducibility and session duration.

    • Conclusions:

    • The automated static perimetry instrument shows promise but requires careful consideration of test logic.
    • Addressing subject error is key to improving the reliability of automated visual field testing.