Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

What are Estimates?

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates.
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...

Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines

Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines

The mechanical efficiency of a machine is a fundamental concept that describes how effectively a machine can convert input work into output work. According to this concept, the efficiency of a machine is equal to the ratio of the output work to the input work. An ideal machine, meaning a machine that has no energy losses, has an efficiency of one. This implies that the input work and the output work are equal.
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Multimachine Stability

Multimachine Stability

Multimachine stability analysis is crucial for understanding the dynamics and stability of power systems with multiple synchronous machines. The objective is to solve the swing equations for a network of M machines connected to an N-bus power system.
In analyzing the system, the nodal equations represent the relationship between bus voltages, machine voltages, and machine currents. The nodal equation is given by:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pharmacokinetics of alvimopan and its metabolite in healthy volunteers and patients in postoperative ileus trials.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007

Same author

Anaesthesia for repair of cleft lip, maxilla and palate in Nepal.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2003

Same author

Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropaenia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003

Same author

Endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) is a downstream target of the homeobox transcription factor Nkx2-5.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2003

Same author

Therapeutic evaluation of free and nanocapsule-encapsulated atovaquone in the treatment of murine visceral leishmaniasis.

Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology·2003

Same author

[The Lazarus phenomenon. Spontaneous return of circulation after unsuccessful intraoperative resuscitation in a patient with a pacemaker].

Der Anaesthesist·2003

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

Published on: August 5, 2015

Are estimates of MAC reliable?

M Paul¹, D M Fisher

¹Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

|December 19, 2001

Summary

Estimating anesthetic potency (minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) can be inaccurate due to study design. Increasing the number of patient crossovers improves accuracy, but benefits plateau after six crossovers.

Area of Science:

Anesthesiology
Pharmacology
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) is a measure of inhaled anesthetic potency.
Traditional MAC studies use an up-down method, assessing only one quantal response per patient.
This limits the determination of individual MAC values and introduces potential inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the impact of interindividual variability on MAC estimates.
To assess how study design factors influence the accuracy of MAC estimations.
To identify optimal parameters for reliable MAC determination.

Main Methods:

Simulated the standard up-down MAC study protocol.
Varied key factors: starting concentration, number of crossovers, concentration increment, interindividual variability, and measurement error.

More Related Videos

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

Published on: August 5, 2015

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Replicated simulations 500 times for each factor to analyze estimate accuracy and variability.

Main Results:

Starting concentrations near the true MAC minimized variability underestimation.
More than six crossovers minimally improved MAC estimates but increased variability estimates.
Larger increment sizes and higher interindividual variability led to more outlier MAC estimates.
Many simulations resulted in MAC estimates deviating over 10% or 25% from the true value.

Conclusions:

Individual MAC experiments can produce inaccurate potency estimates.
Increasing patient crossovers enhances accuracy, with diminishing returns beyond six.
Study design significantly impacts the reliability of MAC measurements.