Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of two methods for predicting aqueous solubility.

D L Peterson1, S H Yalkowsky

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, 1703 E. Mabel Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. peterson@pharmacy.arizona.edu

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
|December 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

The Fate of Ornamental White Fringetree Through the Invasion Wave of Emerald Ash Borer and Implications for Novel Host Use by This Beetle.

Environmental entomology·2020
Same author

Designing a therapeutic hepatitis B vaccine to circumvent immune tolerance.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2019
Same author

Immunological features in pediatric patients with recurrent and severe infection: Identification of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in Merida, Venezuela.

Allergologia et immunopathologia·2019
Same author

Susceptibility of the Stem Pull Area of Mechanically Harvested Apples to Blue Mold Decay and Its Control with a Biocontrol Agent.

Plant disease·2019
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
See all related articles

This study compared two solubility prediction methods: the General Solubility Equation (GSE) and Klopman

Area of Science:

  • Physical Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of aqueous solubility is crucial for drug development and environmental fate assessments.
  • Existing models like the General Solubility Equation (GSE) and group contribution methods (e.g., Klopman) offer different approaches to solubility prediction.
  • Comparing the performance of these models is essential for selecting the most reliable method for specific applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of the two-parameter General Solubility Equation (GSE) with the 171-parameter Klopman group contribution approach for aqueous solubility.
  • To evaluate the performance of both models using a common dataset and established error metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized melting points and partition coefficients from Klopman's test set for solubility calculations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated compound solubilities using the General Solubility Equation (GSE).
  • Compared GSE predictions against solubility values generated by the Klopman group contribution method.

    • Main Results:

    • Both the Klopman method and the GSE provided reasonable solubility predictions.
    • The Klopman method yielded an average absolute error (AAE) of 0.71 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.86.
    • The GSE achieved a lower AAE of 0.64 and an RMSE of 0.92, indicating slightly better performance in this comparison.

    Conclusions:

    • The General Solubility Equation (GSE) demonstrated comparable, and slightly superior, performance to the Klopman group contribution method in predicting aqueous solubility for the tested compounds.
    • Both methods are viable for solubility prediction, but the GSE may offer a slight advantage in accuracy based on this dataset.
    • Further validation across diverse chemical spaces is recommended for both predictive models.