Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function
Published on: July 30, 2017
Olfactory discrimination ability for aromatic odorants as a function of oxygen moiety
1Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestrasse 31, D-80336 Munich, Germany. laska@imp.med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract:
To assess the significance of the type of oxygen moiety on odor quality of aromatic compounds, I tested the ability of human subjects to distinguish between odorants sharing a benzene ring and the same total number of carbon atoms but differing in their functional groups. Phenyl ethanol, phenyl acetaldehyde, phenyl methyl ketone, methyl benzoate and phenyl acetic acid, were employed. In a forced-choice triangular test procedure 20 subjects were repeatedly presented with all possible binary combinations of the five odorants, and asked to identify the bottle containing the odd stimulus. I found (i) that as a group, the subjects performed significantly above chance level in six of the tasks whereas they failed to do so with the four other tasks; (ii) marked interindividual differences in discrimination performance, ranging from subjects who were able to significantly distinguish between all 10 odor pairs to subjects who failed to do so with the majority of the tasks; and (iii) that odor pairs that involved methyl benzoate or phenyl methyl ketone were significantly easier to discriminate than those that involved phenyl acetaldehyde or phenyl ethanol, and thus there was a clear dependence of discriminability on type of functional group. Additional tests of the degree of trigeminality of the five aromatic substances indicated that the discriminability of the odor pairs is indeed due to differences in odor quality. A comparison of the present results with those of an earlier study that employed aliphatic odorants suggests that functional oxygen-containing groups may generally be an important determinant of the interaction between the stimulus molecule and the olfactory receptor, and thus may generally be a molecular property affecting odor quality in a substance class-specific manner. The poorer discriminatory performance of the subjects with aromatic odorants compared with corresponding aliphatic substances suggests that the structure of the alkyl rest attached to a functional group may also play a crucial role for recognition of ligands at the olfactory receptor and thus for odor quality.
More Related Videos
09:53Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase
Published on: April 23, 2019
06:13Combining a Breath-Synchronized Olfactometer with Brain Simulation to Study the Impact of Odors on Corticospinal Excitability and Effective Connectivity
Published on: January 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Olfaction
The olfactory receptors are embedded in the cilia of the...
IR and UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Aldehydes and Ketones
Aromatic Compounds: Overview
In 1825, Faraday isolated benzene...
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n + 2 rule.
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds