PNU-145156E, a novel angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study

H J Groen1, E G de Vries, W Wynendaele

  • 1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Hospital Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands. h.j.m.groen@int.azg.nl

Insights

The maximum tolerated dose of PNU-145156E in solid tumor patients was 1050 mg/m(2). This novel agent did not significantly impact basic fibroblast growth factor levels but showed potential for disease stabilization.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • PNU-145156E, a distamycin A derivative, inhibits angiogenesis and shows preclinical antitumor activity.
  • Phase I trials are crucial for determining the safety and dosage of new cancer therapeutics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of PNU-145156E in patients with solid tumors.
  • To evaluate the effect of PNU-145156E on serum basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) levels.

Main Methods:

  • A Phase I clinical trial involving 29 patients with solid tumors.
  • PNU-145156E was administered intravenously every 6 weeks, with dose escalation from 100 to 1050 mg/m(2).
  • Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and serum bFGF levels were assessed using standardized criteria and assays.

Main Results:

  • The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PNU-145156E was established at 1050 mg/m(2).
  • Dose-limiting toxicities included thrombophlebitis, pulmonary embolism, and grade 3 dyspnea.
  • PNU-145156E exhibited a long terminal half-life of approximately 1 month; no significant change in serum bFGF was observed.
  • Disease stabilization was observed in four patients, but no objective tumor responses were noted.

Conclusions:

  • PNU-145156E is a novel sulfonated distamycin A derivative with an MTD of 1050 mg/m(2) in patients with solid tumors.
  • The drug's pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by a prolonged terminal half-life.
  • PNU-145156E did not significantly affect serum bFGF levels and showed limited efficacy in terms of objective tumor response, although disease stabilization was achieved in some patients.

Related Concept Videos