Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Segmentation and Measurement of Fat Volumes in Murine Obesity Models Using X-ray Computed Tomography
Published on: April 4, 2012
Abdominal fat and birth size in healthy prepubertal children
S P Garnett1, C T Cowell, L A Baur
1The Robert Vines Growth Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. sarahg@chw.edu.au
Insights
Lower birth weight, followed by weight gain in childhood, is linked to increased abdominal fat and higher risk of heart disease in children. This highlights the importance of monitoring growth from birth.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
- Growth and Development
Background:
- The fetal origins hypothesis suggests early life factors influence adult disease risk.
- Birth size may be a marker for adaptations programming future health.
- Childhood fat distribution could mediate the link between birth size and adult disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between birth size and abdominal fat in children.
- To examine associations with blood pressure, lipids, and insulin levels.
- To explore potential links to future cardiovascular risk.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of a birth cohort.
- Inclusion of 255 healthy 7- and 8-year-old children.
- Measurements included dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition, blood tests for metabolic profiles, and automated blood pressure monitoring.
Main Results:
- A negative association was found between abdominal fat and birth weight standard deviation score.
- Children with lower birth weight and higher weight gain showed significantly more abdominal fat.
- Increased abdominal fat correlated with higher cholesterol, triglycerides, and diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions:
- Birth weight independently predicts childhood abdominal fat accumulation.
- Children with higher abdominal fat tended to be lighter at birth and gain weight rapidly.
- Elevated abdominal fat is associated with precursor risk factors for ischemic heart disease.
Background:
Studies examining the foetal origins hypothesis suggest that small birth size may be a marker of foetal adaptations that programme future propensity to adult disease. We explore the hypothesis that birth size may relate to fat distribution in childhood and that fat distribution may be a link between birth size and adult disease.
Objective:
To investigate the relationship between birth size and abdominal fat, blood pressure, lipids, insulin and insulin:glucose ratio in prepubertal children.
Design:
Cross-sectional study, based on a birth cohort of consecutive full-term births.
Subjects:
Two hundred and fifty-five (137 females) healthy, 7- and 8-y-old children.
Measurements:
Body composition and abdominal fat was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Lipid, glucose and insulin profiles were measured after an overnight fast and an automated BP monitor was used for blood pressure measurements.
Results:
There was a negative association between abdominal fat and birth weight s.d. score across a range of normal birth weights (beta=-0.18; 95% CI=-0.31 to -0.04, P=0.009) and a positive association with weight s.d. score at 7/8 y (beta=0.35; 95% CI=0.24 to 0.46, P<0.001). Children who were born with the lowest weight s.d. score and had the greatest weight s.d. score at 7/8 y had significantly more (P<0.001) abdominal fat, as a percentage of total fat (6.53+/-1.3%) than those who had the highest birth weight s.d. score and the lowest weight s.d. score at 7/8 y (4.14+/-0.5%). Similar results were seen if head circumference, but not ponderal index, was used as an indicator of birth size. Increased abdominal fat was associated with higher total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol, higher triglyceride concentration and increased diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions:
Birth weight independently predicted abdominal fat. Children with the highest amount of abdominal fat were those who tended to be born lighter and gained weight centiles. Increased abdominal fat was associated with precursor risk factors for ischaemic heart disease.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the small...
Regression Toward the Mean
Hypodermis
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Obesity

