Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
[Compliance with terminology standards in reflux, ulcers, and gastritis: A study of 881 consecutive upper
N Fritz1, B Birkner, W Heldwein
1Department of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Background:
The German version of the Minimal Standard Terminology document for endoscopy was discussed in 1997 and 1998, and finally published at the end of 1999 as one of the German Gastroenterology Society guidelines. The diagnoses and descriptive terms included in this standard terminology are based on the consensus views of a large number of German endoscopists (20 endoscopists based in Munich and 20 elsewhere in Germany). The aim of the present study was to investigate how much spontaneous compliance there is with the descriptive terms included in the standard terminology - both among the members of the consensus discussions, and among colleagues not involved in this project.
Methods:
A total of 881 endoscopy reports with the diagnoses of reflux, ulcer, and gastritis were collected from 11 centers (2 hospitals and 9 private offices, with a total of 26 examiners) over a one-month period. Nine of the 26 examiners were actively involved in the terminology consensus discussion. The rate of occurrence of the descriptive terms contained in the standard terminology was assessed for the diagnoses listed above.
Results:
Compliance with the descriptive terms was high (> 90 %) only for basic parameters such as the Savary classification of reflux and the area in which gastroduodenal ulcers were located. Other important parameters, such as the extent (length) of Barrett's esophagus, ulcer size, and circumferential location, were reported in only three-quarters of cases or less. The descriptions of gastritis were inconsistent. There was no difference in the degree of compliance either between endoscopists using free dictation and those using computerized text blocks, or between members of the terminology group and those not involved in preparing the terminology.
Conclusions:
Adherence to standard terminology and its descriptive parameters is poor even among specialized gastroenterologists who have been involved in terminology consensus discussions. Compliance needs to be improved by providing suitable software programs with automatic reporting functions.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...