Does this patient have temporal arteritis?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Gerald W Smetana1, Robert H Shmerling
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Context:
Clinicians must be able to confidently diagnose temporal arteritis (TA), since failure to make a correct diagnosis may lead to irreversible visual loss as well as inappropriate evaluation and treatment of headache, fatigue, and other potential presenting symptoms. The diagnostic value of particular signs and symptoms among patients with suspected TA is unknown.
Objective:
To determine the accuracy of historical features, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in diagnosis of TA.
Data Sources:
We performed a MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between January 1966 and July 2000 and a hand search of bibliographies of retrieved articles, previous reviews, monographs, and textbooks.
Study Selection:
Studies that provided detailed clinical information on patients who had been referred for temporal artery biopsy. Of 114 studies retrieved, 41 met our inclusion criteria; 21 included both biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative patients and formed the core of our review.
Data Extraction:
Both authors independently reviewed each study to determine eligibility, abstracted data using a standardized instrument, and classified study quality using predetermined criteria.
Data Synthesis:
The prevalence of TA in the general population is less than 1%. However, in our 21 core studies, 39% of patients referred for temporal artery biopsy had positive results. The only 2 historical features that substantially increased the likelihood of TA among patients referred for biopsy were jaw claudication (positive likelihood ratio [LR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-6.2) and diplopia (positive LR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.6). The absence of any temporal artery abnormality was the only clinical factor that modestly reduced the likelihood of disease (negative LR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.75). Predictive physical findings included temporal artery beading (positive LR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.1-18.4), prominence (positive LR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1-8.9), and tenderness (positive LR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.7). Normal ESR values indicated much less likelihood of disease (negative LR for abnormal ESR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.08-0.51).
Conclusions:
A small number of clinical features are helpful in predicting the likelihood of a positive temporal artery biopsy among patients with a clinical suspicion of disease; the most useful finding is a normal ESR, which makes TA unlikely.
Related Concept Videos
Equipments Used to Measure Body Temperature
Glass-bulb Thermometer:
Glass-bulb thermometers are hollow glass tubes with a bulb tip containing liquid such as ethanol or mercury. Historically, glass bulb mercury thermometers were the standard device to measure body temperature. Today, mercury thermometers are prohibited in many countries due to the hazardous effects of mercury and the risk of exposure if the glass bulb breaks. In general,...
Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's forehead...
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction

