Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].

R W Giard1, L G Bonneux

  • 1Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid, locatie Clara, afd. Klinische Pathologie, Postbus 9119, 3007 AC Rotterdam. giardr@mcrz.nl

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Sensitivity and speed of cell and tissue pre-diagnosis among breast cancer patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in two hospitals, determined with the aid of PALGA data].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Passive smoking: an environmental health risk].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Evaluation of frozen sections and cytological diagnosis during surgery].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[The yield of breast cancer screening: the importance of observational data and the problems of bias].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

[Screening: careful considerations versus commercial medicine].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2003
Same author

[Diagnostic image (68). Retrosternal struma].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2002

A recent review found mammographic screening does not reduce breast cancer deaths and increases aggressive treatments. Further analysis is needed to determine if mass screening, like that in the Netherlands, is still justifiable.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Public Health

Context:

  • Mammographic breast cancer screening is a widely implemented public health measure.
  • A recent Cochrane review questioned the benefits of screening.
  • Over 800,000 women in the Netherlands are invited for screening annually.

Purpose:

  • To re-evaluate the justification of mass mammographic screening.
  • To analyze screening effectiveness from methodological, tumor biological, and societal perspectives.
  • To inform women about the current evidence and potential risks.

Summary:

  • Recent evidence suggests mammographic screening lacks convincing reduction in breast cancer mortality and increases aggressive treatments.
  • Methodological re-analysis is required, considering long-term radiotherapy effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tumor biology needs further exploration regarding the therapeutic consequences of early diagnosis.
  • Societal perspective highlights unrealistic expectations and the need for balanced information.

    • Impact:

    • Raises serious reservations about the continued justification of mass mammographic screening.
    • Emphasizes the need for prompt and transparent communication with women regarding screening uncertainties.
    • Suggests a potential shift in public health policy regarding breast cancer screening protocols.