Sources of variation in profile analysis. II. Component spacing, dynamic changes, and roving level

Profile-analysis experiments have typically employed static profiles with constant frequency components spaced at equal intervals along a logarithmic frequency axis. Most periodic, naturally occurring stimuli, however, have components that are harmonically related and vary dynamically in time. One goal of these studies was to determine whether amplitude-increment detection thresholds are different in dynamic, harmonically spaced profiles compared to those for static-log profiles, and why such differences might exist. A second goal was to determine the impact of roving levels (within-trial variation of level). Thresholds for static-log profiles were, on average, 8.7 dB lower than for static-harmonic profiles. A traditional filter-bank model could not account for this result. No consistent effect of dynamic contour (an exponential rising frequency glide) was observed. Thresholds were consistently poorer by 4 to 7 dB when the level was roved, but the differences in thresholds among the different profiles varied little. It is proposed that the higher thresholds observed in static-harmonic profiles may be accounted for by the more intense pitch strength associated with the harmonic profiles.