Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

Biostatistics involves the application of statistical techniques to scientific research in health-related fields, including biology and public health. These techniques are essential for designing studies, collecting data, and analyzing it to draw meaningful conclusions. Given the complexity of biological processes, particularly in studies involving human subjects, biostatistical methods are crucial for effectively organizing and interpreting data that might otherwise obscure underlying patterns...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Will parity in coverage result in better mental health care?

The New England journal of medicine·2002

Same author

Why don't private employers use risk adjustment? Conference overview.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2002

Same author

The prevalence of formal risk adjustment in health plan purchasing.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2002

Same author

Private employers don't need formal risk adjustment.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2002

Same author

Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.

Health services research·2001

Same author

Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.

Journal of health economics·2001

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Statistical discrimination in health care.

A I Balsa¹, T G McGuire

¹Department of Economics, Boston University, MA 02115, USA. anabalsa@bu.edu

Journal of Health Economics

|January 5, 2002

Summary

Statistical discrimination may explain healthcare disparities. Physicians may struggle to understand minority patients, leading to less effective treatment and care, even without discriminatory intent.

Area of Science:

Health economics
Medical sociology
Health disparities research

Background:

Racial and ethnic minorities experience significant disparities in healthcare access and outcomes.
Understanding the root causes of these disparities is crucial for developing effective interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore statistical discrimination as a potential explanation for racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare.
To analyze how physician-patient communication challenges can contribute to unequal healthcare benefits.

Main Methods:

Literature review comparing predictions of statistical discrimination theory with existing research.
Analysis of theoretical implications for patient benefit and care-seeking behavior.

Main Results:

Keywords:

Health Care and Public Health Professional Patient Relationship

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Statistical discrimination can lead to minority patients benefiting less from treatment.
This can occur even without physician bias or objective health differences.
Patients may rationally demand less care due to perceived lower benefit.

Conclusions:

Statistical discrimination is a plausible contributing factor to racial and ethnic healthcare disparities.
Further research is warranted to investigate this phenomenon and its impact.