Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based pediatric nursing: does it have to hurt?

S L Rush1, J Harr

  • 1School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

AACN Clinical Issues
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characteristics of families enrolled in an isolated, mountain Head Start program: managing social capital.

Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing·2002
Same author

Variation in therapy and outcome for pediatric head trauma patients.

Critical care medicine·2001
Same author

Prescription and administration of around the clock analgesics in postoperative pediatric cardiovascular surgery patients.

Progress in cardiovascular nursing·1999
Same author

Double-u double-u double-u dot APIC dot org: a review of the APIC World Wide Web site.

American journal of infection control·1996
Same author

Positioning your patient properly.

The American journal of nursing·1996
Same author

Elders' expected and realized benefits from cardiac surgery.

Cardio-vascular nursing·1994

Pediatric nursing traditions can conflict with evidence-based pain management, leading to children receiving inadequate pain relief. This review examines how myths and biases impact pediatric pain care.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nursing
  • Pain Management
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Pediatric nursing often relies on tradition and intuition.
  • While some traditions are valuable, others may not align with current evidence-based practices.
  • Despite available evidence, children are frequently undertreated for pain compared to adults.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the impact of traditional practices, personal biases, and persistent myths on pediatric pain relief.
  • To highlight the gap between evidence-based guidelines and actual clinical practice in pediatric pain management.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review examining the influence of tradition, bias, and myths in pediatric pain management.
  • Analysis of existing evidence on pain assessment and management in children.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Traditional practices and personal biases can hinder the implementation of evidence-based pain management strategies.
  • Persistent myths about pain in children contribute to their undertreatment.
  • A significant disparity exists in pain management between pediatric and adult patients.

Conclusions:

  • Challenging traditional practices and addressing personal biases are crucial for improving pediatric pain relief.
  • Overcoming myths surrounding children's pain is essential for evidence-based care.
  • Standardizing pain assessment and management protocols based on scientific evidence is necessary to ensure adequate pain relief for children.