Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions.

R Salo1, A Henik, L C Robertson

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

Neuropsychology
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intracerebroventricular phospho-tau immunotherapy alleviates cortical phospho-tau burden and motor phenotype in a neuron-specific P301S tauopathy mouse.

Experimental neurology·2025
Same author

Observing ageism implicitly using the numerical parity judgment task.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Right anterior cerebellum BOLD responses reflect age related changes in Simon task sequential effects.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: The impact of emotional and non-emotional distracting information.

Biological psychology·2016
Same author

Lateralisation of emotions: evidence from pupil size measurement.

Cognition & emotion·2016
Same author

Using executive control training to suppress amygdala reactivity to aversive information.

NeuroImage·2015
Same journal

The association between daily real-time assessment of subjective cognitive function and objective cognition using ecological momentary assessment.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Obtaining comparable measurement of midlife cognitive functioning from disparate cognitive tasks.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive impairments associated with meningiomas and gliomas in adults: A systematic review.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Neuropsychological assessment in low-resource versus high-resource contexts: A reply to comments on Stiers (2026).

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Testing is important: A truism worth remembering.

Neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Of dogs and diagnoses: Does clinical reasoning still matter in an age of biomarkers, functional imaging, and artificial intelligence?

Neuropsychology·2026
See all related articles

Methodological differences in the Stroop Color and Word Test impact interference. The clinical version

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuropsychological assessment

Background:

  • The Stroop Color and Word Test is widely used in clinical settings.
  • Inconsistencies exist in the literature regarding its findings.
  • Methodological variations may explain these discrepancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate methodological differences between the clinical and computerized single-trial Stroop Color and Word Test.
  • To determine how different Stroop task presentations affect interference levels.
  • To clarify the impact of neutral stimuli selection on performance.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to compare Stroop task versions.
  • Experiment 1 examined the effect of blocking.
  • Experiments 2 and 3 investigated different control conditions and attentional shifting.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Different Stroop task presentations yield varying levels of interference.
  • Greater interference in the blocked clinical version is linked to faster neutral condition response times (RTs).
  • The choice of neutral stimuli significantly influences performance metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Methodological variations, particularly in neutral stimuli, critically affect Stroop test performance.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for interpreting clinical findings.
  • Standardizing methods may improve the reliability of the Stroop Color and Word Test.