Contraceptive practices of women after abortion in Turkey

The aim ofthis study was to determine the postabortion contraception choices of women and the subsequent reduction in pregnancy rate. The changes in method of contraception during the 1-year follow-up period were also assessed.

Ninety women decided to practice family planning methods following an abortion procedure. The family planning choices of the postabortion family planning group were determined by active immediate family planning counselling. The control group, which consisted of 23 women who had had an abortion and wanted to become pregnant again, were followed-up for 1 year to determine their pregnancy rate. The pregnancy rates and methods used were determined during a 12-month follow-up period.

Following counselling, 79.64% of the patients signed for immediate family planning practice. In the postabortion family planning group, one out of 90 patients (1.1%, Pearl index 1.29) practising contraception with a condom became pregnant. However, ten out of 23 (43.5%, Pearl index 54.2) patients in the control group became pregnant during the 1-year follow-up period (p < 0.05). In the postabortion family planning group, intrauterine devices (IUDs) (n = 43), injectable monthly contraceptives (n = 24) and tubal ligation (n = 9) were the most commonly preferred methods, with 47%, 27% and 10% of the women using these methods, respectively. At the end of the 12-month period, the drop-out rate among women using the injectable monthly contraceptives was significantly higher (13 patients, 54%) compared to other methods (p < 0.05). In one case out of 43 using an IUD (2.38%), the IUD was expelled during follow-up.

The use of postabortion family planning significantly decreased the postabortion pregnancy rate. The use of an IUD was the preferred immediate method of choice. Use of injectable monthly contraceptives was the method with the highest drop-out rate. The expulsion rate of postabortion IUDs was acceptable in our practice. The pregnancy rate in the control group was lower than the physiological fecundity would predict. This may suggest that, although couples plan to get pregnant, they do not concentrate on the ideal conditions for conception or they do, in fact, practice some form of family planning.