Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selective attention modulates implicit learning.

Y Jiang1, M M Chun

  • 1Yale University, New Haven, USA. yuhong@MIT.EDU

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2017
Same author

Visual quality determines the direction of neural repetition effects.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2006
Same author

Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex.

Psychological research·2005
Same author

Perceptual learning of temporal structure.

Vision research·2002
Same author

The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Effects of phonological length on the attentional blink for words.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Selective attention enhances implicit learning. When search items are relevant and attended, learning improves; ignored items do not yield similar learning effects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Implicit learning, the process of acquiring knowledge without conscious awareness, is fundamental to human cognition.
  • Selective attention allows individuals to focus on relevant stimuli while filtering out distractions.
  • The contextual cueing paradigm is a well-established method for investigating implicit learning of spatial regularities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of selective attention in implicit learning within the contextual cueing paradigm.
  • To determine whether implicit learning occurs when only attended or ignored visual information is spatially consistent.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments utilized the contextual cueing paradigm with visual search tasks.
  • Participants searched for a target among distractors presented in either an attended or ignored color.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Spatial configurations of attended and ignored items were manipulated for consistency with target locations.

    • Main Results:

    • Facilitated visual search, indicative of contextual cueing, was observed when the spatial configurations of attended items were invariant and predictive of target location.
    • No contextual cueing effects were found when the spatial configurations of ignored items were consistently paired with target locations.
    • These findings highlight the crucial role of attention in implicit learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Implicit learning is significantly influenced by selective attention.
    • Learning of spatial regularities is robust only when the relevant, predictive information is actively attended to.
    • This suggests that attentional mechanisms gate the consolidation of implicit memories.