Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

International research ethics.

U Schuklenk1, R Ashcroft

  • 1University of the Witwatersrand, Imperial College, London.

Bioethics
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protocol for a cluster randomised control trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in recent migrants within primary care: the CATAPuLT trial.

BMC public health·2019
Same author

Ethics and social acceptability of a proposed clinical trial using maternal gene therapy to treat severe early-onset fetal growth restriction.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2016
Same author

Clinician and service user perceptions of implementing contingency management: a focus group study.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2011
Same author

The ethics of mandatory vaccination against influenza for health care workers.

Vaccine·2008
Same author

Are meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection targets fair to those with other types of healthcare-associated infection or cost-effective?

The Journal of hospital infection·2008
Same author

Patient selection for facial transplantation III: Ethical considerations.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2007
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

This article examines key international research ethics debates, focusing on therapeutic vs. non-therapeutic research distinctions and the feasibility of providing best treatments globally. It also addresses ownership and decision-making for global ethics guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Global Health Research
  • Research Governance

Background:

  • Ongoing international debate on research ethics.
  • Need for critical overview of complex ethical issues in global health research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Critically analyze core challenges in international research ethics.
  • Examine the distinction between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research.
  • Assess the feasibility and ethical implications of providing best-practice treatments in diverse global settings.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of existing literature and ethical frameworks.
  • Analysis of key ethical dilemmas in international research.
  • Discussion of governance and decision-making processes for global research ethics guidelines.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Debate continues on upholding the therapeutic vs. non-therapeutic research distinction.
  • Feasibility and ethical justification of providing best-proven treatments in all countries remain contentious.
  • Questions arise regarding ownership and consensus-building for international research ethics guidelines.

Conclusions:

  • International research ethics face persistent, complex challenges.
  • Resolution requires addressing disagreements on treatment standards and guideline governance.
  • Further dialogue is needed on equitable research practices and ethical framework development.