Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

08:47
Mimicking and Measuring Occlusal Erosive Tooth Wear with the "Rub&Roll" and Non-contact Profilometry
Published on: February 2, 2018
Laboratory evaluation of mouthguard material.
D Tran1, M S Cooke, P R Newsome
1Orthodontics, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Summary
Thicker 5 mm ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) material is recommended for mouthguards. This material showed the least deformation under load and performed well in tensile strength, elongation, hardness, and water absorption tests.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Sports Dentistry
Background:
- Ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer is widely used in fabricating custom mouthguards.
- Understanding EVA material properties is crucial for optimizing mouthguard design and performance.
- Existing research may not fully elucidate the impact of EVA thickness on its mechanical and physical properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an in vitro evaluation of EVA material properties relevant to mouthguard applications.
- To investigate the influence of varying EVA sheet thicknesses on key performance characteristics.
- To provide data-driven recommendations for improving mouthguard design based on material science.
Main Methods:
- Mechanical and physical properties of EVA sheets (1, 2, 3, and 5 mm thickness) were assessed.
- Tensile strength and elongation tests were performed according to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards.
- Hardness and water absorption tests were conducted to evaluate material behavior.
Main Results:
- Increased EVA material thickness led to a decrease in ultimate tensile strength.
- Higher thicknesses also resulted in reduced elongation at break.
- Hardness and water absorption remained unaffected by variations in EVA thickness.
Conclusions:
- The 5 mm EVA material demonstrated superior performance with the least deformation under load.
- EVA thickness significantly impacts tensile strength and elongation but not hardness or water absorption.
- Thicker EVA (5 mm) is recommended for mouthguard fabrication due to its optimal balance of properties and performance.

