Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The euthanasia debate.

N M Harris1

  • 1Duke of Connaught Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, BFPO 801.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps
|January 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Euthanasia, the deliberate ending of a life to relieve suffering, remains a complex moral and legal issue. Debates involve patient autonomy, medical ethics, and the distinction between active and passive euthanasia.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bacteriology of Pulmonary Infections.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

CONGENITAL TUBERCULOSIS AND BACTERIAL DISSOCIATION.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

BACILLUS MORTIFERUS (NOV. SPEC.).

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THERMOSTAT-ROOM.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
Same author

The Relative Importance of Streptococci and Leucocytes in Milk.

Public health papers and reports·2009
Same author

Meglumine Eicosapentaenoic acid (MeEPA) a new soluble omega-3 fatty acid formulation: in vitro bladder cancer cytotoxicity tests in combination with epirubicin and mitomycin.

Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids·2006
Same journal

A tribute to the <i>Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps</i>.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
Same journal

Towards the future: The final issue of the journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 1903-2019.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
Same journal

Interests and concerns of the Army Medical Services as reflected by the publications in the <i>Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps</i> 1903-2019.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
Same journal

Dispatched from the Editor in Chief: does the impact factor have any real relevance to our military health journal?

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
Same journal

Highlights of the edition: the military medical ethics special issue.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
Same journal

Aeromedical evacuation in the humanitarian and disaster relief environment of Op RUMAN.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Legal Philosophy

Background:

  • Euthanasia debates have ancient roots, with historical arguments still relevant today.
  • The issue is contentious due to its illegality, the prevalence of passive euthanasia in hospitals, and medical advancements prolonging life.
  • Financial constraints in healthcare and the conflict between patient autonomy and physician duty add complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define euthanasia and related concepts, including voluntary, involuntary, active, and passive forms.
  • To explore the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding end-of-life decisions.
  • To provide a framework for understanding the ongoing societal debate on euthanasia.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical arguments and contemporary ethical considerations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of definitions and classifications of euthanasia (voluntary/involuntary, active/passive).
  • Examination of legal and medical perspectives on end-of-life interventions.
  • Main Results:

    • Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate intervention to end life and relieve suffering.
    • Distinctions between voluntary/involuntary and active/passive euthanasia are crucial for debate.
    • Passive euthanasia (withholding life-sustaining treatment) is often viewed as distinct from active euthanasia.

    Conclusions:

    • Euthanasia presents persistent moral and ethical challenges within medical, legal, and societal contexts.
    • Understanding the nuances of different euthanasia forms is essential for informed discussion.
    • The debate is fueled by evolving medical capabilities, healthcare economics, and fundamental rights.